...poor for their poverty, because it's just their mindless, tabula-rasa adoption of 'the culture' that is concerned, rather than biological factors which might lead them to sharing a functioning level with blacks. People under their ideological perspective are not unique individuals but a set of 'circumstances' on a slate. Pressure decibelmilliwatts for an alternative explanation of this which isn't just his rephrasing of my explication of the dishonesty of his communist word-salad ideas, you'll see my point. His way of thinking makes me so angry that I'd gladly pagger his celto-negroidae little face if he dared plod the Lothian streets.
Instead, we should be seeking how to rectify these issues. Hufschmid's ideas on socio-biological technology are an idea in the right direction. We should be working to chemically, endocrinologically, and nutritionally raise the functioning of the poorest, as well as applying eugenics to ensure they actually shit out fit children in the next generation, rather than denying they have a problem and attributing it to 'the culture.' It's a shit cop-out which perpetuates their suffering as well as those for whom problems are caused at their hands.
I've said it before, but I've always said it sincerely and personally, having been the product of two downwardly-mobile working class, later underclass, pseudo-Whites. Literally the only thing that's saving me from my potential being completely denoued is being a sperg. That is why I laud hypermale as a religion. His evil little ideology tries to de-contextualise that, too. He tries to rephrase the male as a sex of aggression using common syllogistic conflations of hormonal states with behavioural states,
when I have demonstrated otherwise. This all relies on an over-simplification of what I mean by 'male', in particular confusing the burly, muscular alpha male (a negroide-form, which when applied to whites, is only of his imagination) with the traditional sensitivities of the European hypermale-elite aristocracy. It stands to reason, he is a genocidal maniac out to destroy all that is divinely aristocratized (high-AQ, high-IQ, high-energy, high-focus, high HPTA-resilience, which are all genotypically-derived factors) by exalting the screeds of feminist, communist, Zionist, negroidalist homogeneity.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
So, who is this guy?
Edit: I meant to say something like "Who are you talking about?" but I then noticed the wording and realized it could be misunderstood. My bad.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
@previous (Anarquista )
Annoying commie retard from Minichan whose argument to everything is 'inessentialism, inessentialism, inessentialism!'
@previous (Dr. Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
In that case, he must be a shit tier Communist and a secret statist.
did... did you just accuse someone of wordsalading? damlol
@previous (D)
He word salads in a different way. It's grammatically contextual and he uses all the right words but they only bare internal reference to his self-serving idolatrously demagougical framework. I'm stumbling over awkward concepts with the sincere intention of trying to convey an awkward observation from a fresher approach or an unconventional point of view, that I've crafted over the course of my independent ideological work. He doesn't want to think, he just wants to signal. I don't care if I unintentionally signal that I'm a spastic retard by not having the right 'style', I'm at least attempting to think.
As a feral basement dweller who was raised by his computer in lieu of his parent's ability to tolerate him, he's far from qualified to judge me inadequately indoctrinated, we were effectively exposed to the same culture, I just had more of the 'stuff' which the fabric of moral values comes from, and whatever that is, that has to come from within, his lack of restraint could
only be explained in the terms of a sociopathy.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)