Topic: US cancer man billed and deported from UK as 'burden on taxpayer'
+Anonymous A — 12.5 years ago #33,406
A taste of your own medicine?
http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/11068766.Sussex_father_deported_because_cancer_treatment_was_too_expensive/
Actually, I think this is despicable. The Home Office clearly missed the part where he had been living here with his family (and paying taxes, no doubt) for more than a decade.
The NHS has now waived the £98k (rough guess $160k?) bill. Expect more of this if Dave and his chums get their way.
+Sophie !MLHqI35Srs — 12.5 years ago, 2 minutes later[T] [B] #383,287
Useless eater hail eugenics probably a crypto-Jew etc etc.
+Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2 — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,289
Good. We need less emotion. People have let their emotions run wild which has caused social justice and modern feminism, it's sad if someone gets cancer but we have to accept that our modern lifestyle with it's prosessed foods and extra sugar it's all making cancer as common as the cold.
> The couple, who have ten-year-old daughter Alexandra, married in 2001, but Ralph had chosen not to apply for residency status.
It's his own fault. Probably one of those overly patriotic yanks.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Sophie !MLHqI35Srs — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,290
@previous (Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2)
That's not what glucose-fructose syrup does or remotely close to the mechanism of how it works you magically thinking negroid. Leave science to those at least attempting to understand it.
People have let their emotions run wild and it has similarly caused an upsurge in pseudo-patriotic bromides like you.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,291
·Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2 — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,292
@383,290 (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
So you don't think that cheap prosessed foods and milk injected with hormones has any links to cancer?
·Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2 — 12.5 years ago, 43 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,293
@383,291 (A)
> The couple, who have ten-year-old daughter Alexandra, married in 2001, but Ralph had chosen not to apply for residency status.
> Ralph had chosen not to apply for residency status.(Edited 12 seconds later.)
·Sophie !MLHqI35Srs — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,294
@383,292 (Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2)
You treat the link as a causal effect though, that's the issue. Also I wasn't speaking about the hormones or any other processing. Generally speaking, British milk is stripped of its hormones (even the good ones like liothyronine), which causes more problems than hormonal milk.
·Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2 — 12.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,295
@previous (Sophie !MLHqI35Srs)
Maybe I didn't make myself fully clear. I wasn't talking specifically but more generally on how moderen living isn't as good for you.
·Sophie !MLHqI35Srs — 12.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,296
@previous (Hitlerputsch !saAqdaazn2)
I never denied that for one second. You're the one who can't formulate specific arguments so strengthen your point in the manner of a dilettante by confusing general sentiment with the irrelevant mention of a specific speaking point out of context.
+Morbid !vbsvhaneDY — 12.5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,297
+Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 12.5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,304
·Sophie !MLHqI35Srs — 12.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,306
@previous (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk)
I'm aware of this. I wasn't lauding the merits of fructose-glucose syrup by any means. But to say it leads directly to cancer is hyperbolic and plain misleading. Still, I would recommend its avoidance.
·Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 12.5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #383,319
Agreed. And while a lot of news agencies ran the whole HFCS causes corn syrup business, the study I know of that was believed to support this claim is very misleading. Although if you already have cancer, HFCS can exacerbate it, since we know that cancer cells feed off sugar, removing most of it, if not all from your diet can be a solid part of a cancer treatment plan.
+Anonymous F — 12.5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #383,367
> deported from the UK
sounds like a 'blessing in disguise'..
+Anonymous G — 12.5 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #383,497
@383,304 (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk)
Oh, bullshit. Honey has the same balance of sugars as HFCS. All of the dumbasses tout it as a superfood. Sugar is sugar.
·Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 12.5 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #383,501
@previous (G)
I'll concede that natural does not always mean better, but that wasn't my point. Please see:
@383,304 (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk) or
The Fructose Epidemic - FDR
Even natural alternatives that may potentially be less unhealthy than HFCS are still not healthy, period.
Substituting Honey for Refined Carbohydrates Protects Rats from Hypertriglyceridemic and Prooxidative Effects of Fructose
Is Honey Better than HFCS
There's also this idea that local honey helps w/ allergies but it seems unsubstantiated to date, regardless of people believing it does.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+Anonymous H — 12.5 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #383,511
cancerman is the true american superhero..
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.