TinyChan

A common speaking point of the sexual bolshevists is the false equivocation of the hormone testosterone with dominance and aggression in a supremacist context that necessarily inveighs over the determination of individuals.

It is more true that estrogen as a hormone not only promotes the listless indolence of passivity to the point of robbing the autonomy of those for whose blood streams excessive levels circulate, and consequentially, with its adrenostimulation of cortisol levels, in turn further perpetuating the cortisol-estrogen vicious cycle, make women so predisposed violent, aggressive, and sociopathic, seeking vindication of a vendetta against any target of convenience, usually younger members of the opposite sex. It is not a hormone of peace, let alone of emotional self-discovery. Maybe it is a hormone of emotional self-adulation; any empathizing will be self-directed, a systematized hypocrisy of the autism-feminine, since any abnormal rise in the hormone will usually be co-factorial with testosterone.

Hypomasculine traits such as aggression can typically be ascribed to the above in males as well as females. Negroids are known to have over-active adrenals, which is why Jews are composed despite having twice the levels of testosterone than in negroids and four times the levels of indigenous Whites. Negroid males are also known to have over-active prostates with hyperactive aromatase enzymes, which are practically shitting out estrogen on a continuous basis. Negroids male aggression could not less stem from an inability to dominate and resent towards one's subjugation, which is why it is incorrect to equivocate dominance with aggression, except in desire.

White male 'desire' for domination has typically been an inadvertent product of their innate ability, less than some hormonally-driven quest, unless counting Berserkers, in which we can more attribute the interaction of testosterone with an inherently autistic (hypermasculine) neurostructure; even such a stimm is conducted with peaceful care in their consideration to the environment, an honourability to a warrior code established in the Havamal.

So now we have deconstructed yet another cultural Marxist hypocrisy making misandric presumptions about male behavioural origins. Yet another success for the hypermale.

• PM
• Forget Thread
• Watch
• 39 visits

Femenists disregard all good things that men have in favor of becoming a kind of post-fem male. This is apart from the tendencies of gender dysphoria and transgenderism, but it is a product of so-called penis envy. They want to be the one in charge, after all the book of Bereshit (Genesis in the Tanakh) says that "your desire will be for your husband*" and means that she will desire his authority. This is the best proof that women have been this way for a long time, even if the Tanakh is NOT the word of G-d. I do though hold it as the truth though, so I obviously can't say that myself.

*Sefer Bereshit, 3:16

• PM