Topic: FuckAlms said that one does not subscribe to the special snowflake mentality
+Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago #32,308
Contrarily, one merely makes the sole exceptional factor of existence one's abstinence from the collectivist asahaya, i.e. exit from the paradigm being the 'snowflake'.
I've figured you out now. Shill.
I've figured you out now. Shill.
+Anonymous B — 12.6 years ago, 4 minutes later[T] [B] #372,015
@OP
ok shill
ok shill
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #372,016
@previous (B)
I am not a shill. I'm the only one who has managed to retain their principles whilst realising who I really was. Everyone else seems to do this as a form of atonement. What do I have to atone for? Much beyond how pathetically I've lived my existence on a personal level, not a great deal.
I am not a shill. I'm the only one who has managed to retain their principles whilst realising who I really was. Everyone else seems to do this as a form of atonement. What do I have to atone for? Much beyond how pathetically I've lived my existence on a personal level, not a great deal.
·Anonymous B — 12.6 years ago, 55 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #372,017
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 56 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #372,018
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #372,021
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 12.6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #372,022
@OP
Slight mis-quote there. I don't subscribe to it; that's not to say that it is not something which other people could , and indeed do, subscribe to.
Slight mis-quote there. I don't subscribe to it; that's not to say that it is not something which other people could , and indeed do, subscribe to.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #372,030
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I was avoiding use of gendered pronouns because you're always ambiguous on the question of it, and 'they' is objective and plural, so it's stupid to use that in substitution.
My actual criticism itself though is that in a way, you do, by thinking it exceptionalizes your character in some distinguishing way.
I was avoiding use of gendered pronouns because you're always ambiguous on the question of it, and 'they' is objective and plural, so it's stupid to use that in substitution.
My actual criticism itself though is that in a way, you do, by thinking it exceptionalizes your character in some distinguishing way.
+Anonymous E — 12.6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #372,039
@372,016 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
@372,016 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
> I'm the only one who has managed to retain their principles whilst realising who I really was. Everyone else seems to do this as a form of atonement. What do I have to atone for? Much beyond how pathetically I've lived my existence on a personal level, not a great deal.
No, you've compromised and circumvented your alleged principles to conform to your worldview. Your espoused philosophy is just an eclectic hodgepodge filled with contradictions and no congruency beyond misanthropy across the board. Also, you need Jesus.
@372,016 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
> I'm the only one who has managed to retain their principles whilst realising who I really was. Everyone else seems to do this as a form of atonement. What do I have to atone for? Much beyond how pathetically I've lived my existence on a personal level, not a great deal.
No, you've compromised and circumvented your alleged principles to conform to your worldview. Your espoused philosophy is just an eclectic hodgepodge filled with contradictions and no congruency beyond misanthropy across the board. Also, you need Jesus.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #372,045
@previous (E)
> Because Christianity is totally congruent, free of contradictions and totally anthrophillic.
No, cheers.
> Because Christianity is totally congruent, free of contradictions and totally anthrophillic.
No, cheers.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 12.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #372,067
@372,039 (E)
> eclectic hodgepodge
> read electric hedgehog
goddamnit /cwc/
@372,030 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
At the root of it all, I'm just apathetic. It's a necessary trait to be an effective moderator. If you care, you get trolled. If you care that you've been trolled, you snowball into a shit-tier lolcow.
> eclectic hodgepodge
> read electric hedgehog
goddamnit /cwc/
@372,030 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
At the root of it all, I'm just apathetic. It's a necessary trait to be an effective moderator. If you care, you get trolled. If you care that you've been trolled, you snowball into a shit-tier lolcow.
·Anonymous E — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #372,077
@372,045 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Gotta go fast.
@372,045 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Christianity is more congruent than Phaginism.
Gotta go fast.
@372,045 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Christianity is more congruent than Phaginism.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #372,090
@372,067 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I understand, and you make a decent job. Don't take my meanderings for anything more than Schrodingerian philosophical play, at times at least (not the negating the times I'm more soppy and sentimental with my approach; this wasn't one of them.)
I understand, and you make a decent job. Don't take my meanderings for anything more than Schrodingerian philosophical play, at times at least (not the negating the times I'm more soppy and sentimental with my approach; this wasn't one of them.)
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.