Hobbensian felicity (the idea that the world is merely about one's place and face, and nothing intrinsic), being a genetically essential, emanative product of the recombinative chromosome's intellectual and emotional mediocrity, stems from two general trends in the behavioural proclivities of proto-female, which for all intents and purposes can be, described as a neurotype of the White, the 'most retarded Aryans', or 'failed Aryans':
1. A deficit in introspective foresight: introspection goes insofar as 'woe me,' 'why me,' 'me me me.' Ironic that they hold to being the place-
makers in the world; that's it though, it's
contrived, only hypermale would care as to see where it actually
is. One may wonder if this is the origin of Dawkin's concept of the 'meme', it similarly robs introspection for the ease of the regurgitation of self-replicating culturally-deconstructive pathogens to instil 'place' in the world. One example of a memetic form taken bio-physically is those amoeba mocking masculinity by dressing down as 'men' and claiming it to be a legitimate form of meta-sexualism (eschewing use of the word 'trans';
I've explained my issues with the word and when I do employ its usage, it's merely for convenience.)
Granted, bona fide cognitively male amoeba exist, but they're gold dust (in a haystack with overdiagnosed garbage); one might argue that cognitive masculinity commensurated with aggregate protofeminid traits to be toxic --- this is how lesbianism arrives, after all. It disbalances in favour of the terminally aggressive narcissismus-oedipa, with the overwhelming majority of characteristics retained remaining
negative-protofemale.
Conversely, hypermales live introspectively, lacking the psychopathic executive decision making factor to 'centrally plan' one's personal resources like a Soviet bureaucrat thousands of days into the future
- the proto-female social strategization mode - as a basis for prognosticative foresight, so that, even if executed not as well, life paths are executed with maximum utility and respect to deeper meaning; that's to say, destiny, and in particular, in acknowledgement of essential destiny. The finest state, literally, of being, versus protofemale-doing. And make no mistake, whilst a 'deficit' in a liberal, attention-deficit 'democratic' age, this was the stuff our civilization had priorly been founded upon.
2. A lack of maudlinity and trend to emotional-homogeneity; 'if I can't feel it, you must be deluded', i.e., feigned 'empathy' in the age of the hyper-oedipal feminist-covenant-supreme:
Emotions come well of the proto-female in an entirely cognitively processed sense, but this is merely the filter with which negative-women express their toxic primordial and instinctual rages, aggressions, and other amygdalal pathologies, stemming from a resentment towards inability to use the intimative goading of their constant expectations to being gratified submissive, passive roles
- sexual or otherwise - to which all others must be made servile, met. Amygdala is literally the 'doggie position' brain. In its most heightened state of stimulation, depending upon a contingency of confrontation from external stimuli, the capitulation of its
usufructuary holder (for our spiritually incorporeal meta-essence in these physical essences must not be forgotten) is all too obtainable to whatever form said stimulus may take. This, I think, is the real reason why hypermales are forcibly trained to involuntarily surrender eye contact (and as author of the Neanderthal Theory stated rightly, it serves no real social function; extended, one may reason it is purely a gesture of the matriarch's sceptre), but the matriarchy's evil aside for a moment...
The emotional fragility of the proto-female being a cognitively evolved function and thus not a primordial one (dra-goy who hit the testosterone showing this once autism settles in and the pathology of their complete instinctualness is exposed, as a result of being unable to manufacture convincing emotions any longer) points to, in the general, a proclivity to what would nominally be recognized as not pro-social behaviour
- this is the adumbration of pretension behind a substantial dearth of depth, analogous to their falsely-appropriated beauty, and neotony - but hyper-antisocial (looking social but basically sociopathic) behaviour; a great presence, fast, flamboyant, gabby and gumptive, but to what end other than mutually assured destruction?
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
...And it is for the hypermale's lack of interest or even when interested, lack of neurocognitively essential characteristics to emulate the behaviour beyond a stilted heuristic, creating internally a level of unsettling anxiety which, like predator to prey, proto-female are exceedingly efficient in sniffing out, that hypermale's alienation occurs tracing back ultimately to one source: a disconnect between the shallowness of affective empathy exhibited in protofemale to the overwhelming, almost Akashially cosmic imbuement of it in the hypermale, especially hypermale neo-women. Such rejection of such expressions of the deepest of the affective are ensured by this employment of traditional conservatism seemingly ingrained in proto-female on the most fundamental of levels. I.e. it is born-women causing emotional suppression, not men, especially not extreme-males of any sort.
So I'm incontrovertibly and uncontestably right once again. No surprise there. Cheers.
@previous (B)
This has been the least schizophasic of my writings hitherto. See the logic befacing you with a cruelly entrenched sense of reality.
@371,369 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Try posting this somewhere people actually spend time researching and discussing these subjects, not a chan full of halfwits. You may as well be saying this shit to the wall and declaring yourself the winner because it doesn't argue back.
@371,380 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
> This has been the least schizophasic of my writings.
wow, i almost feel sorry for you lol
@371,402 (C)
I would, but the only places who, at least, feign the intelligence and curiosity, seem to be dominated by insufferable liberal cuntfaces.
@371,402 (C)
> Try posting this somewhere people actually spend time researching and discussing these subjects
shitredditsays and tumblr doesnt count bruh
@previous (B)
I know they don't, like I already said, somewhere that isn't full of halfwits.
@OP
> One may wonder if this is the origin of Dawkin's concept of the 'meme', it similarly robs introspection for the ease of the regurgitation of self-replicating culturally-deconstructive pathogens to instil 'place' in the world.
> Dawkin's concept of the meme
> Dawkin's
Lol, retard, his name is Richard Dawkins. You fucked up the apostrophe. Stopped reading at that point, because if you can't get the simple things correct, why should I trust you can cogently argue a point?
@previous (E)
Non-sequitur. Neither spelling nor grammar are abstract order skills; reasoning is. It doesn't follow that strengths in the concrete are matched by strengths in the abstract. Negroids show us this on psychometric tests. Retroactively it doesn't follow that weaknesses in the concrete are matched by weaknesses in the abstract. Working class whites, poorly educated for whatever reason
- typically purpose ignorance caused by resource-impoverishment of the local authority - show us this by beating even the gentrified negroes on those measures.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Nice hasty editing, but
> strength's in the concrete
> strength's
Lol, retard, you're still fucking up the apostrophe. If you can't get even these simple things right, why should you be taken seriously on weightier matters?
@previous (E)
I noted it and corrected it in due course. Why should I take your anal retention for anything other than undiagnosed Aspergers w/ODD? Go play with your Talmudean tracts, sperg.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)