Topic: Worthless radfem factoids (3 parts)
+Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago #32,004
Though now deleted forever by the jew Josh of Scatchan, who is really a reptillian shapeshifted metaform of Nekoarc (which I shall expose in an upcoming tract), I did demonstrate there to be no incongruence between the hypermale condition and this contingency-based woman-form, the bona fide homosexual-transsexual reproductively augmented, the substantial canvas that transcends the style of a pudgily underevolved, concertedly efforted by the monopolization of beauty to appear deceptively neotenous, homogenous and troglodytic under-caste of amoebic chromosomal fossils who have long outlasted their course.
I shall break down their arguments given a lack of opportunity last night due to tiredness, partly caused by the attruition of typical gumption-laden succubi attitudes aspersed by conceited bitches who cower at their denial of an existential nymphomaniac solipsism, as is all they ever do with their life.
> Trend against XY anomaly
Homogenization indeed would be the situation reverted to without regulatory eugenics, which is why the measures I propose must take place. It is an anomaly with the precedent of the recombinative chromosomal form still in circulation within the genetic pool, removed it is no longer an anomaly.
> Mother is XYZ and she's all the things we must heave her hive-highness of womb-god-worship-immortality.
Mother is the cause of 98% of the most severe autism (a fact French psychodynamists thankfully still acknowledge), adumbrated in the Anglospheric Occident behind a cultural-Marxist-cum-radical-feminist apologist-school of behavioural modification waged against the autist, but in particular of their most perfected hypermale form, the contingency of this neuro-infrastructural emanation being the factor for there being a refrigerative, matriarchally-dominative and supremacist relationship existing in the first instance, for mother is at its quintessence by substance as well its stle, the mishyperandric genocidist and worse still, fire of Yahweh's feminine avatar (the shenikah); whilst it cannot be helped and care ensured that it is not blamed personally, the sinfully inhuman must be dehumanized reciprocally if we are to rectify wrongs into rights, sins into virtues, evils into goods, etc. This process of behavioural modification involves indoctrinating these poor spastics with the predominantly matriarchal values of neurodiversitarian hypocrises, lain with homogenonormative themes e.g. 'everyone is both equal and special', to feel 'proud' about the shell-like inhumanity, brought to them by the impassiveness of their brood-rejector, who is merely a psychosocially-attruitive refrigerator trying their best to deconstruct the hypermale. So we find, it is not enough that flawed maternal nature homogenizes its genetics on an evolutionary level, but this sees its vengeful, venomous emanation socially too; mother is, in a word, dangerous, reinforcing dysgenic pathology- pro-XX homogenization - with instinctual child-rearing parasitology, and needs institutionally eradicated for its own good.
Allowing for the synthesization of the essential ingredients for creation (a level of abstraction from the factoids of rote-brained womanly bromides for whom comes hard of) in the upward-technocratist style of hypermale's creative prognostication (protowoman's inborn epistemological approach being, oppositely, of antegnosticative stasis via. uninspired absorption, consumption of binged-upon memetic tropes, and downward-technocratist Hobbensianism-justification- the kind of which Kazinski spoke against - such being the inherent mode of morality programed innate to her pathological instinct), neo-woman results, removed of this pathological instinct, forming the first step to breaking the selective process homogenizing downward the chromosomal modality.
I shall break down their arguments given a lack of opportunity last night due to tiredness, partly caused by the attruition of typical gumption-laden succubi attitudes aspersed by conceited bitches who cower at their denial of an existential nymphomaniac solipsism, as is all they ever do with their life.
> Trend against XY anomaly
Homogenization indeed would be the situation reverted to without regulatory eugenics, which is why the measures I propose must take place. It is an anomaly with the precedent of the recombinative chromosomal form still in circulation within the genetic pool, removed it is no longer an anomaly.
> Mother is XYZ and she's all the things we must heave her hive-highness of womb-god-worship-immortality.
Mother is the cause of 98% of the most severe autism (a fact French psychodynamists thankfully still acknowledge), adumbrated in the Anglospheric Occident behind a cultural-Marxist-cum-radical-feminist apologist-school of behavioural modification waged against the autist, but in particular of their most perfected hypermale form, the contingency of this neuro-infrastructural emanation being the factor for there being a refrigerative, matriarchally-dominative and supremacist relationship existing in the first instance, for mother is at its quintessence by substance as well its stle, the mishyperandric genocidist and worse still, fire of Yahweh's feminine avatar (the shenikah); whilst it cannot be helped and care ensured that it is not blamed personally, the sinfully inhuman must be dehumanized reciprocally if we are to rectify wrongs into rights, sins into virtues, evils into goods, etc. This process of behavioural modification involves indoctrinating these poor spastics with the predominantly matriarchal values of neurodiversitarian hypocrises, lain with homogenonormative themes e.g. 'everyone is both equal and special', to feel 'proud' about the shell-like inhumanity, brought to them by the impassiveness of their brood-rejector, who is merely a psychosocially-attruitive refrigerator trying their best to deconstruct the hypermale. So we find, it is not enough that flawed maternal nature homogenizes its genetics on an evolutionary level, but this sees its vengeful, venomous emanation socially too; mother is, in a word, dangerous, reinforcing dysgenic pathology
Allowing for the synthesization of the essential ingredients for creation (a level of abstraction from the factoids of rote-brained womanly bromides for whom comes hard of) in the upward-technocratist style of hypermale's creative prognostication (protowoman's inborn epistemological approach being, oppositely, of antegnosticative stasis via. uninspired absorption, consumption of binged-upon memetic tropes, and downward-technocratist Hobbensianism-justification
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #368,577
> let's mischaracterize childbirth as a female-specific experience that cannot be objectively observed, so allowing us to histrionically seek the attention and resources of those so foolishly deceived by our signals to engage in passive parasitism of the male-sublimationist chivalry relation, anointing us as the womb-god you are compelled to kowtow in servitude as a subservient morlock!
Accidentally, whilst trying to impersonate the typical litter-bemoaning behemoth of malignant matriarchism, I have explicated the true motive of this subjectivization of its, largely non-existent, pain, as shown in recent studies, which were not conducted this time by the public relations machine of Jew-reviewed radfem faux-journals, the same kind where Temple Grandin's mother spews her rigmarole presuming all autistic men without fathers to be paedophillic infantilists. It had shown that even scraping one's knee had a far greater intensity and agony factor, and was about equal to being beaten by a gang of hoodlums. Not unsurvivable experiences by any means, the latter being an everyday occurrence for the hypermale, usually at the hands of anti-fas in the employ of those very radical feminist curs.
Conclusion:
Matriarchism is dangerous on several levels. First in the refinement of the racial lifeblood to the truly divinated aristocracy conceived across a number of different bio-metrices; sexual, ethnological, and class-hierarchical (or intra-racially eugenic). From the attempt of the radical feminist to cause a reversion to chromosomal homogenization, has brought forth one major factor in the dysgenic trend of reproductive patterns, for a feminized race, one whose XY chromosome is most similar to their XX, shall have a lower range of intellectual capacity even if the aggregate mean sees a meagre improvement. It's true that Fabian arguments could be employed with some vauge validity to discredit the value of the most ultimately derided trait of the masculine: the extreme retard.
Following on secondly, this is probably the greatest evidence of maternal compassion being completely ingenuous, for it is the most often-employed soundbite of the radical feminist in discrediting the hypermale, and with its conflation of him with this beast of burden, and indeed, mistaking it to be a beast of burden (for the extreme retard is less a product of deficits in general intelligence- that would actually be the female, despite their receptiveness to melioration falsely increasing their phenotypical intelligence - but rather hyper-specialization; since women think in aggregates, this goes unappreciated by them) the most often deployed justification of insane matriarchal tyrannical power.
Therefore, the exceptionality of the worst having to be accommodated with the exceptionality of the best can only be achieved by a kind of meritocratic class system only the hypermale could possibly construct, and that only hypermale has the genuine (affective, non-cognitive; i.e. non-psychopathic, the inverse of the female-empathic modality) empathy to feel inside himself the motivation compelling its creation, as was the case before radical feminist imposed matriarchal-domination of the retard, stifling his job opportunities and enforcing upon him lifelong welfare dependency during the development of the occidental welfare state in the 1960s. For instance, in antebellum confederate America, men in the IQ ranges of the 20s to the 70s were utilized in all forms of agricultural and industrial occupation, usually with exceeding mastery due to their particular gifts in task specialization, an impossibility in women of even higher general intelligence (weighed in any case to a vocabulary and grammar merely utilized as means to the end of a grand, compulsive white-lying, social chessboard strategem).
Accidentally, whilst trying to impersonate the typical litter-bemoaning behemoth of malignant matriarchism, I have explicated the true motive of this subjectivization of its, largely non-existent, pain, as shown in recent studies, which were not conducted this time by the public relations machine of Jew-reviewed radfem faux-journals, the same kind where Temple Grandin's mother spews her rigmarole presuming all autistic men without fathers to be paedophillic infantilists. It had shown that even scraping one's knee had a far greater intensity and agony factor, and was about equal to being beaten by a gang of hoodlums. Not unsurvivable experiences by any means, the latter being an everyday occurrence for the hypermale, usually at the hands of anti-fas in the employ of those very radical feminist curs.
Conclusion:
Matriarchism is dangerous on several levels. First in the refinement of the racial lifeblood to the truly divinated aristocracy conceived across a number of different bio-metrices; sexual, ethnological, and class-hierarchical (or intra-racially eugenic). From the attempt of the radical feminist to cause a reversion to chromosomal homogenization, has brought forth one major factor in the dysgenic trend of reproductive patterns, for a feminized race, one whose XY chromosome is most similar to their XX, shall have a lower range of intellectual capacity even if the aggregate mean sees a meagre improvement. It's true that Fabian arguments could be employed with some vauge validity to discredit the value of the most ultimately derided trait of the masculine: the extreme retard.
Following on secondly, this is probably the greatest evidence of maternal compassion being completely ingenuous, for it is the most often-employed soundbite of the radical feminist in discrediting the hypermale, and with its conflation of him with this beast of burden, and indeed, mistaking it to be a beast of burden (for the extreme retard is less a product of deficits in general intelligence
Therefore, the exceptionality of the worst having to be accommodated with the exceptionality of the best can only be achieved by a kind of meritocratic class system only the hypermale could possibly construct, and that only hypermale has the genuine (affective, non-cognitive; i.e. non-psychopathic, the inverse of the female-empathic modality) empathy to feel inside himself the motivation compelling its creation, as was the case before radical feminist imposed matriarchal-domination of the retard, stifling his job opportunities and enforcing upon him lifelong welfare dependency during the development of the occidental welfare state in the 1960s. For instance, in antebellum confederate America, men in the IQ ranges of the 20s to the 70s were utilized in all forms of agricultural and industrial occupation, usually with exceeding mastery due to their particular gifts in task specialization, an impossibility in women of even higher general intelligence (weighed in any case to a vocabulary and grammar merely utilized as means to the end of a grand, compulsive white-lying, social chessboard strategem).
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #368,579
It must be implored, the question of what an all-matriarchal society, appearing after the radical feminists successfully impose their genocidally Maoist cultural revolution, eliminating every one of the hypermale in sight except faux-transsexual fetishist mangynae (Jessica Sideways, ADF, and Robbie Rotten being prime candidates for survival; phenotypically autistic enough to be slightly intellectually delayed but without the initiative brought by that dimensional depth bestowed by the hypermale condition, consummating obedient subservience) whom they can rely upon for continued political legitimacy and support, with the aggregate characteristics of negative proto-woman, i.e. social strategization > task-specialization, cognitive empathic psychopathy > affectively empathic emotional sensitivity, a narrow range of low-mediocre intellectual ability overly compensated for by verbal perspicacity, and a streak of passive-aggression, mischaracterized in the current day as 'self confident assertiveness', belying any pretense to the insightful instinctualness they espouse, strangely lacking by any other expression than a narcissistic compulsion to horde on objectified resources, from the brood to the bread, being the ethnic infrastructure of a society that in its legislative-executive manifestation ultimately bases itself upon an appeal to Hobbensian morality having considered themselves at the centre-fold of their egotistical fire, their basic conception of godliness-on-Earth that they solely represent, argued to the effect of a superficial felicity, but without any truly meritable place except hubristically, by their own self-adulative aggrandizement. Such a society based on air, as is that female substance compromised beneath the canvas upon which masculine sexual egotism is projected, is undoubtedly prone to near-instantaneous collapse.
+Anonymous B — 12.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #368,580
Didn't read lol
+Anonymous C — 12.6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #368,581
+Morbid !vbsvhaneDY — 12.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #368,583
Thanks for putting in the effort but no.
+duckky — 12.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,640
tl;dr
+fullmouthextraction !2CQezZ7g6I — 12.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,880
there are just a lot of words
+Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,881
@previous (fullmouthextraction !2CQezZ7g6I)
Hasn't worthless post-modernist academia taught you that even seemingly disparate salads have context? And especially in this case it was the intention to say something. Figure it out.
Hasn't worthless post-modernist academia taught you that even seemingly disparate salads have context? And especially in this case it was the intention to say something. Figure it out.
+Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,882
not reading that wall of salad
·fullmouthextraction !2CQezZ7g6I — 12.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,930
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.