Topic: I love being a women!
+Booboo — 12.6 years ago #31,946
It's so sensuous and erotica I can't evan begin to explain the pleasure of being the female sex.... Win win winning!
+Anonymous B — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #367,920
@OP
> It's so sensuous and erotica I can't evan begin to explain the pleasure of being the female sex.... Win win winning!
Okay Autphag.
> It's so sensuous and erotica I can't evan begin to explain the pleasure of being the female sex.... Win win winning!
Okay Autphag.
·Booboo (OP) — 12.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #367,921
Being a women is a powerful pleasure. All encompassing desire for the male sex!!
+Hello(kitty on my phone) — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #367,922
Enjoy never knowing what it feels like to soften inside your lover during post coital cuddling.
+thepsychic !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #367,932
+Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 11 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,076
This, a trillion times.
Death to any male who has yet deferred to the hypermale neo-woman, and their ex-femalewhore dra-goy allies.
Also fucking kill all ciswomen, the homogenized, recombinative chromosome, inherently Lesboidic muck of their mediocrity and unrefined passivity, completely parasitic upon the hypermale's creative majesty. It's imperative that hypermale spread from itself forth by itself and with itself as perfectly crafted via. the artificial womb, a technology as any other suppressed by radfem chauvanical interests, whether inadvertently by intellectual laziness and fifth-column STEM-infiltration, or actively by ethical committee stifling and filibustering.
Death to any male who has yet deferred to the hypermale neo-woman, and their ex-femalewhore dra-goy allies.
Also fucking kill all ciswomen, the homogenized, recombinative chromosome, inherently Lesboidic muck of their mediocrity and unrefined passivity, completely parasitic upon the hypermale's creative majesty. It's imperative that hypermale spread from itself forth by itself and with itself as perfectly crafted via. the artificial womb, a technology as any other suppressed by radfem chauvanical interests, whether inadvertently by intellectual laziness and fifth-column STEM-infiltration, or actively by ethical committee stifling and filibustering.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,077
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,078
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
It's about principle here. I do not hate you in particular. But woman has to go, she is obsolete, we've the technology to perfect her and the demand to fill her role. The greatest claim of the radfem's I've wanted to disprove is that transsexuals would crawl away from the alleged 'fetishism' if this was compulsory. I do not believe this to be so. The pain of childbirth is grossly exaggerated for one. Being collectively kicked by yobs actually has a higher factor of intensity and agony, and with a high pain tolerance such as mine (I was jumping from hills just a few weeks ago), I doubt this would be a problem.
It's about principle here. I do not hate you in particular. But woman has to go, she is obsolete, we've the technology to perfect her and the demand to fill her role. The greatest claim of the radfem's I've wanted to disprove is that transsexuals would crawl away from the alleged 'fetishism' if this was compulsory. I do not believe this to be so. The pain of childbirth is grossly exaggerated for one. Being collectively kicked by yobs actually has a higher factor of intensity and agony, and with a high pain tolerance such as mine (I was jumping from hills just a few weeks ago), I doubt this would be a problem.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,081
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
cant take a hold of a species get rid of a gender and think this is a higher state in evolution. people are dumb. stop it. I am the majority
cant take a hold of a species get rid of a gender and think this is a higher state in evolution. people are dumb. stop it. I am the majority
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,082
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
The majority are tyrannical mobsters pinning the noble to the floor.
What's more, the crypto-radfem rational-ethicalists have the order of the transition back to front if we want to weed out fakes, for full transition is the proof that one is not a fetishist, for he who was a mere transvestitic fapstain would go kill himself (contingent on the transition; the pre-transsexual who kills herself may well just have been left choiceless), and well, we do not need any more disposable men who couldn't make it even as normal proletarian plebeian Fabiotic 'Soviet citizens' as it were. It would also make the expense of anti-androgens less bothersome on the whole. I did read once, too, that the actual cost of the operation itself for the provider is in the pennies.
The majority are tyrannical mobsters pinning the noble to the floor.
What's more, the crypto-radfem rational-ethicalists have the order of the transition back to front if we want to weed out fakes, for full transition is the proof that one is not a fetishist, for he who was a mere transvestitic fapstain would go kill himself (contingent on the transition; the pre-transsexual who kills herself may well just have been left choiceless), and well, we do not need any more disposable men who couldn't make it even as normal proletarian plebeian Fabiotic 'Soviet citizens' as it were. It would also make the expense of anti-androgens less bothersome on the whole. I did read once, too, that the actual cost of the operation itself for the provider is in the pennies.
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,083
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
men NEED women and women need men, and "transwomen" is always always gonna be the minority to women and thats an OK and healthy world
men NEED women and women need men, and "transwomen" is always always gonna be the minority to women and thats an OK and healthy world
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,085
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
Not truly. Sperm needs egg to make zygote. That's about it. The problem with my old philosophy, other than it was a rather stilted expression of my desire to suppress what was beneath, was that it never accounted for the healthy expression of male sexual instinct, and if that is to be eliminated, male becomes little better than the canvas that is (proto-)'woman', homogenizes unto itself without a rational selection process based on nature's rules, and becomes potentially even more inferior than his female predecessors. So we must extend the canvas, and reform its expressive media, so that the XY's genetic expression is upregulated again (it is a sophistical myth that the chromosome contributes nothing, that is dependent upon hormonal physiology, the suppression of which at either cellular or serum levels is what causes XY's inertia, which in this new neo-female canvas is desired). I'd go further again and say we need to somehow select for more androgen-resistant 'born'-transsexuals to later implant wombs in, and the continued existence of those proto-transsexuals in the intermediary (I don't intend to oversee their obsolescence any time soon, naturally).
We can't be content with constants and eternal certainties for their expedience becomes inconvenient in the term of a continual period of transedental furtherance (avoiding the terms evolution and progression because of their co-opting by Fabians, Darwinian Dawkensian whigpots, etc.)
Btw you misunderstand too that there is no such thing as a 'gender' for this was feminist-postmodernist gobbledygook dreamt up by the cultural inessentialists. I'm looking to eliminate an obsolete chromosomal medium, and all of the expressions brought forth that it might even if they happen to bare vauge resemblance to hypermale itself, for example the Asperger female, which I find to be a dubious concept even if in a cultural Marxist world that's proof of 'no incongruence between femininity and Aspergers existing.' If that were so of course, Cohen would be fired, the cunt (it's not the fact of his extreme male brain hypothesis that perturbs me, for when one understands it one sees it only talks about intellectual masculinity; it's the deliberate permission given to radfems and liberals alike to misconstrue that to deny autist sexuality and reduce it to prole mono-sexuality). They're all liars, giving you double-entendre hidden lies so as to deceive you.
Not truly. Sperm needs egg to make zygote. That's about it. The problem with my old philosophy, other than it was a rather stilted expression of my desire to suppress what was beneath, was that it never accounted for the healthy expression of male sexual instinct, and if that is to be eliminated, male becomes little better than the canvas that is (proto-)'woman', homogenizes unto itself without a rational selection process based on nature's rules, and becomes potentially even more inferior than his female predecessors. So we must extend the canvas, and reform its expressive media, so that the XY's genetic expression is upregulated again (it is a sophistical myth that the chromosome contributes nothing, that is dependent upon hormonal physiology, the suppression of which at either cellular or serum levels is what causes XY's inertia, which in this new neo-female canvas is desired). I'd go further again and say we need to somehow select for more androgen-resistant 'born'-transsexuals to later implant wombs in, and the continued existence of those proto-transsexuals in the intermediary (I don't intend to oversee their obsolescence any time soon, naturally).
We can't be content with constants and eternal certainties for their expedience becomes inconvenient in the term of a continual period of transedental furtherance (avoiding the terms evolution and progression because of their co-opting by Fabians, Darwinian Dawkensian whigpots, etc.)
Btw you misunderstand too that there is no such thing as a 'gender' for this was feminist-postmodernist gobbledygook dreamt up by the cultural inessentialists. I'm looking to eliminate an obsolete chromosomal medium, and all of the expressions brought forth that it might even if they happen to bare vauge resemblance to hypermale itself, for example the Asperger female, which I find to be a dubious concept even if in a cultural Marxist world that's proof of 'no incongruence between femininity and Aspergers existing.' If that were so of course, Cohen would be fired, the cunt (it's not the fact of his extreme male brain hypothesis that perturbs me, for when one understands it one sees it only talks about intellectual masculinity; it's the deliberate permission given to radfems and liberals alike to misconstrue that to deny autist sexuality and reduce it to prole mono-sexuality). They're all liars, giving you double-entendre hidden lies so as to deceive you.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,088
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
wow I do not know what you are saying. OBVIOUSLY sperm needs an egg. thats not wat im saying. you need women in your life to grow up well adjusted. every baby needs a mommy
wow I do not know what you are saying. OBVIOUSLY sperm needs an egg. thats not wat im saying. you need women in your life to grow up well adjusted. every baby needs a mommy
+Anonymous F — 12.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,090
@368,085 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Why are you concerned with reproduction when you will never reproduce?
Why are you concerned with reproduction when you will never reproduce?
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 2 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,091
@368,088 (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
Take time to re-read it, I didn't just make up shite on purpose with a mental thesaurus, there is a point to be made here and I'm sure somebody like you could comprehend it with the patience.
Mother, again, is a style. In a superegotistical world of quasi-faggot, fatherly-aligned hypermen subconsciously yearning for the covert masculinity expressed ethereally in the form of the hypermale neo-woman, mother might needn't exist, though there's no reason why that role cannot be superiorly exerted by hypermale neo-woman, for the pathologically suffocating instincts of maternalism are at last regulated, allowing their offspring a superlatively calibrated adjustment to an already-congruent social environment, for only hypermales know hypermale demands, wiles, needs and wants, and to serve them in a rationally appealed way as opposed to an empty, impositional, consumerist, infantilist, effeminized, and statist one.
Take time to re-read it, I didn't just make up shite on purpose with a mental thesaurus, there is a point to be made here and I'm sure somebody like you could comprehend it with the patience.
Mother, again, is a style. In a superegotistical world of quasi-faggot, fatherly-aligned hypermen subconsciously yearning for the covert masculinity expressed ethereally in the form of the hypermale neo-woman, mother might needn't exist, though there's no reason why that role cannot be superiorly exerted by hypermale neo-woman, for the pathologically suffocating instincts of maternalism are at last regulated, allowing their offspring a superlatively calibrated adjustment to an already-congruent social environment, for only hypermales know hypermale demands, wiles, needs and wants, and to serve them in a rationally appealed way as opposed to an empty, impositional, consumerist, infantilist, effeminized, and statist one.
·Anonymous F — 12.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,092
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
You're just a baby. Crying and whining whilst mommy continues to neglect you.
You're just a baby. Crying and whining whilst mommy continues to neglect you.
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,093
@368,091 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
I cant understand you, between all the new terms, and everything, nothing is registering. wha? What. whats a hypermale neowoman? a trans? a trans woman cant breast feed, or give birth, these two things r important mother business
I cant understand you, between all the new terms, and everything, nothing is registering. wha? What. whats a hypermale neowoman? a trans? a trans woman cant breast feed, or give birth, these two things r important mother business
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,094
people born comfortable with the sex theyre born with are not a blight on the human species man
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 8 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,095
@368,093 (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
Started early enough, she can. The terms aren't as important as the meanings, just try to read it with the whole picture in mind first and let the terms make sense to you by context as you read it again, and again, and again. It'll eventually click, I'm sure. If you'd read closely, I was suggesting how we'd get around those problems.
Started early enough, she can. The terms aren't as important as the meanings, just try to read it with the whole picture in mind first and let the terms make sense to you by context as you read it again, and again, and again. It'll eventually click, I'm sure. If you'd read closely, I was suggesting how we'd get around those problems.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,096
@368,092 (F)
I was a feral child thanks to the psychodynamic refrigeration of my mother's impassivity, and that was how I became free from the negrotypical swarthe. Aryans evolved by rejecting mother.
In case you didnae notice though, I'm actually crying for da, who's been long gone.
I was a feral child thanks to the psychodynamic refrigeration of my mother's impassivity, and that was how I became free from the negrotypical swarthe. Aryans evolved by rejecting mother.
In case you didnae notice though, I'm actually crying for da, who's been long gone.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,098
@368,095 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
maybe ill read it later im only between classes now. I just think women dont need to go, at all, and I think u shudnt believe that craziness. i dont need to die
wheres the racist jew hating drugg addled autie we all know and love?
maybe ill read it later im only between classes now. I just think women dont need to go, at all, and I think u shudnt believe that craziness. i dont need to die
wheres the racist jew hating drugg addled autie we all know and love?
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,100
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
I never stopped being a racist Jew-hater lol. It's just expressing itself differently.
Most people, when they have this kind of experience, just switch teams to reflect their 'affiliation.' Well, sorry, I'm a metapol, and a metaphil, this kind of recontextualization is the substance of my worldview, I don't see any incongruence even if the less accustomed therewith can't fit it within their simple click-reactionary dialectics.
I never stopped being a racist Jew-hater lol. It's just expressing itself differently.
Most people, when they have this kind of experience, just switch teams to reflect their 'affiliation.' Well, sorry, I'm a metapol, and a metaphil, this kind of recontextualization is the substance of my worldview, I don't see any incongruence even if the less accustomed therewith can't fit it within their simple click-reactionary dialectics.
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,103
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,106
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
The feeling's mutual. You're the best superstitious Arab I know, and the kindest.
The feeling's mutual. You're the best superstitious Arab I know, and the kindest.
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,107
+Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,114
·Anonymous B — 12.6 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,115
@368,096 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
If you don't mind me asking, when / how did you lose your your father? It's something I've always wondered.
If you don't mind me asking, when / how did you lose your your father? It's something I've always wondered.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,116
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,118
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,121
@368,115 (B)
Coincidentally, around the same time my issue started (13), and I've now pinned the causality on his absence, I'm certain of it. I became a lot more withdrawn, now rotting along (the replacement step-dad who moved in was a fucking narcissistic psychopath quasi-Jew, typical suppressed faggot putting on all the machismo, so much that it was like having an aggressive bulldyke inside a male body constantly standing in front of me, tormenting me with his violence) with the single-parent matriarch, who only exacerbated the problem with the attruitive shame she had imposed upon me from afar, with her disappointment at my inability to match her exacting expectations of the good prole lad she wanted. It insulted me most that even my idea of masculinity as a guise was completely inexpedient to her shitty plans, she just wanted to wear me down irrespective of what I was for being me, the 'mistake', as she had admitted when I was 16.
Coincidentally, around the same time my issue started (13), and I've now pinned the causality on his absence, I'm certain of it. I became a lot more withdrawn, now rotting along (the replacement step-dad who moved in was a fucking narcissistic psychopath quasi-Jew, typical suppressed faggot putting on all the machismo, so much that it was like having an aggressive bulldyke inside a male body constantly standing in front of me, tormenting me with his violence) with the single-parent matriarch, who only exacerbated the problem with the attruitive shame she had imposed upon me from afar, with her disappointment at my inability to match her exacting expectations of the good prole lad she wanted. It insulted me most that even my idea of masculinity as a guise was completely inexpedient to her shitty plans, she just wanted to wear me down irrespective of what I was for being me, the 'mistake', as she had admitted when I was 16.
+Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,135
@368,078 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
> The pain of childbirth is grossly exaggerated for one.
Really. How many children have you given birth?
> The pain of childbirth is grossly exaggerated for one.
Really. How many children have you given birth?
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,140
@previous (H)
That isn't the point. Women lie about their supposedly sacrosanct experiences all the time, abusing the hypermale naivety inherent in his trustworthiness for the femalewhore is the congenital psychopath of nature, as I've discussed before. They'll whine and bitch that just about everything is far more incommensurable a struggle than it is in actuality, because they know the deceptive neotenous appearance accentuated further by their exaggerated childishness will always yield a damsel in distress response, and our shared-hypochondriasis, almost Munchausen-like in their imposition, leads us to believe that women must be telling the truth about childbirth. But it's not the case. Like everything else they spin. Nor do the anecdotes of 'the majority', which is really like a pact of serial killers lending themselves biased character references in court, go to affirm that except this tendency of theirs.
That isn't the point. Women lie about their supposedly sacrosanct experiences all the time, abusing the hypermale naivety inherent in his trustworthiness for the femalewhore is the congenital psychopath of nature, as I've discussed before. They'll whine and bitch that just about everything is far more incommensurable a struggle than it is in actuality, because they know the deceptive neotenous appearance accentuated further by their exaggerated childishness will always yield a damsel in distress response, and our shared-hypochondriasis, almost Munchausen-like in their imposition, leads us to believe that women must be telling the truth about childbirth. But it's not the case. Like everything else they spin. Nor do the anecdotes of 'the majority', which is really like a pact of serial killers lending themselves biased character references in court, go to affirm that except this tendency of theirs.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,141
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
It is the point. You stated it. I don't care about your subjective feelings toward women, but don't become a blatant liar.
It is the point. You stated it. I don't care about your subjective feelings toward women, but don't become a blatant liar.
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,142
@previous (H)
They aren't subjective. The sentiment of the hypermale is one of neocortical origins. For amygdalal responses you may seek the company of your fellow succubus moon covenant.
They aren't subjective. The sentiment of the hypermale is one of neocortical origins. For amygdalal responses you may seek the company of your fellow succubus moon covenant.
·Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,144
@previous (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
Don't be jealous that you'll never have a true vagina and be be able to experience all that is female.
You're a bigger piece of shit than before you died. A gutless shell of a man who despises his own anatomy. You can't have it both ways as hard as you wish you could.
Go cry with your fellow primal group therapy buddies.
Don't be jealous that you'll never have a true vagina and be be able to experience all that is female.
You're a bigger piece of shit than before you died. A gutless shell of a man who despises his own anatomy. You can't have it both ways as hard as you wish you could.
Go cry with your fellow primal group therapy buddies.
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
·Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,145
@previous (H)
Okay, Cogsdev2Vivian.
Nobody cares about your homogeneity-chauvinism, your neurotype, essentially, is done for, and even ours in the body of your pathetic chromosome, for they cannot be trusted. Only the pure hypermale, by whatever the XY canvas expresses, may live on.
Okay, Cogsdev2Vivian.
Nobody cares about your homogeneity-chauvinism, your neurotype, essentially, is done for, and even ours in the body of your pathetic chromosome, for they cannot be trusted. Only the pure hypermale, by whatever the XY canvas expresses, may live on.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,210
@368,116 (Nautphagina !MLHqI35Srs)
? I don't know what you're referring to?
@368,118 (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
The girls I've been with seemed to have gotten a kick from feeling me soften. Power trip or something, I dunno
? I don't know what you're referring to?
@368,118 (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
The girls I've been with seemed to have gotten a kick from feeling me soften. Power trip or something, I dunno
·Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,213
+Anonymous I — 12.6 years ago, 13 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,214
·Anonymous F — 12.6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,215
·duckie !AiQkqOKm/c — 12.6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,258
@368,210 (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
um
@368,213 (H)
I am gonna have to agree, whatever it is, it isnt dominance lol
um
@368,213 (H)
I am gonna have to agree, whatever it is, it isnt dominance lol
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #368,302
@368,213 (H)
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
I wasn't trying to be 100% on that, glad to know I'm wrong atually.
Now that I think of it, the GIrlfriend I had that was a domineering bitch didn't enjoy it, and instead loved forcing me out by clenching her muscles afterwards :/
@previous (duckie !AiQkqOKm/c)
I wasn't trying to be 100% on that, glad to know I'm wrong atually.
Now that I think of it, the GIrlfriend I had that was a domineering bitch didn't enjoy it, and instead loved forcing me out by clenching her muscles afterwards :/
·Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #368,456
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
Well it does help if women explain these things to men. You guys are pretty upfront, where women tend to be confusing and not exactly direct.
Well it does help if women explain these things to men. You guys are pretty upfront, where women tend to be confusing and not exactly direct.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #368,499
@previous (H)
Younger guys seem feel the need to get super defensive too, especially when it comes to a girl they're dating, it gets kinda annoying.
Younger guys seem feel the need to get super defensive too, especially when it comes to a girl they're dating, it gets kinda annoying.
+Anonymous J — 12.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #368,528
no1cars
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #368,536
·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 12.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #368,537
·Anonymous H — 12.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #368,573
@previous (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
That men are from Mars and women are from Venus and it helps to have a little Mars in women and a little Venus in men. Mang.
That men are from Mars and women are from Venus and it helps to have a little Mars in women and a little Venus in men. Mang.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.6 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #369,120
@368,537 (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
I'm saying that young guys feel like they have to PROVE that they like their girlfriends, instead of being secure in the fact that the girl likes him
I'm saying that young guys feel like they have to PROVE that they like their girlfriends, instead of being secure in the fact that the girl likes him
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.