Topic: Why are you still a feminist?
+Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.8 years ago #29,392
If you could, I'd have told you to tick them all because they're likely all true.
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| I am easily intimidated by matriarchal dogma | - | 0% | |
| Identifying w/ power of divine feminine having been stripped of my masculinity | - | 0% | |
| Oedipal complex | - | 0% | |
| Autogynephile transsexual in the closet | - | 0% | |
| Being a sociopath, I'm forced to integrate the external image of the 'empath' | - | 0% | |
| Being an autist, I can't into geo-political context and just go with any old SJW | - | 0% | |
| The epigenetic effects of having too many sisters and not enough brothers, | - | 0% | |
| ...and a single mother to top it all off | - | 0% | |
| Open transgender (possibly with other mental illnesses) trying to fit in | - | 0% |
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 12.8 years ago, 5 minutes later[T] [B] #342,199
never
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,203
@previous (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
You're a good girl. And you deserved better than a cosmopolitan pansy like Quack.
You're a good girl. And you deserved better than a cosmopolitan pansy like Quack.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
+Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 17 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,204
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,206
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
You know, the trans symbol is just half a star of David anyway. I'd have preferred if he wrote 'TRANS QUEERS FOR YAHWEH' or something. Looks Jewish enough.
You know, the trans symbol is just half a star of David anyway. I'd have preferred if he wrote 'TRANS QUEERS FOR YAHWEH' or something. Looks Jewish enough.
·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,208
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,216
@342,206 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
God and Satan are two sides of the same coin, all religion is wrong, we are all gods who struggle to co create reality with each other and we perceive life as we do now because a mass amount of us have been led to believe in life as we know it for as long as its been known.
God and Satan are two sides of the same coin, all religion is wrong, we are all gods who struggle to co create reality with each other and we perceive life as we do now because a mass amount of us have been led to believe in life as we know it for as long as its been known.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,217
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
That's some Discordian Robert Anton Wilsonian crap there. Fuck that. Anti's a retard for believing in such shit.
That's some Discordian Robert Anton Wilsonian crap there. Fuck that. Anti's a retard for believing in such shit.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,219
@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Woah I'm talking about my beliefs here bud, don't rage lash at anyone else
That's what I believe, that we are living in a holographic universe, and the generally accepted way of thinking is why our hologram is shaped the way it is. I'm not saying I'm going to imagine myself turning into a woman and with no physical stimulus magicly change, but when we change our perception we are getting a peek under a veil. If a group of people unite together and believe in something stronger than any belief in god, a belief in themselves, there isn't anything they are limited by except their own collective creativity
Woah I'm talking about my beliefs here bud, don't rage lash at anyone else
That's what I believe, that we are living in a holographic universe, and the generally accepted way of thinking is why our hologram is shaped the way it is. I'm not saying I'm going to imagine myself turning into a woman and with no physical stimulus magicly change, but when we change our perception we are getting a peek under a veil. If a group of people unite together and believe in something stronger than any belief in god, a belief in themselves, there isn't anything they are limited by except their own collective creativity
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,221
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
Nobody is a particularly original thinker on a place like this I should think --- the likelyhood any of you have a 150+ IQ on here is next to nill, so your ideas will have a descendency from somewhere else even if you're unaware of them and indeed, even if you came to them independently initially. I'm at least intellectually honest enough that I try to find the etymological origin of my thoughts.
Nobody is a particularly original thinker on a place like this I should think --- the likelyhood any of you have a 150+ IQ on here is next to nill, so your ideas will have a descendency from somewhere else even if you're unaware of them and indeed, even if you came to them independently initially. I'm at least intellectually honest enough that I try to find the etymological origin of my thoughts.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,223
@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Sorry it took me so long for my message, I didn't want to distract the argument from myself
Sorry it took me so long for my message, I didn't want to distract the argument from myself
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 7 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,228
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
Anyway, so that's a mixture of Brain-in-a-vat, Ickean swifteanism, a pathetic denial of your previous antecedents to appear more rational, and some self-esteem movement garbage?
Yeah, you're a liberal whigpot wreck.
Anyway, so that's a mixture of Brain-in-a-vat, Ickean swifteanism, a pathetic denial of your previous antecedents to appear more rational, and some self-esteem movement garbage?
Yeah, you're a liberal whigpot wreck.
+Anonymous D — 12.8 years ago, 8 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,229
@342,221 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Find the etymology of etymological before you use it. Better idea, instead of butchering our language why don't you get on with the suicide you promised?
Find the etymology of etymological before you use it. Better idea, instead of butchering our language why don't you get on with the suicide you promised?
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,231
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 45 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,232
@342,228 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
> Anyway, so that's a mixture of Brain-in-a-vat, Ickean swifteanism, a pathetic denial of your previous antecedents to appear more rational, and some self-esteem movement garbage?
>
> Yeah, you're a liberal whigpot wreck.
Can someone do spark notes?
> Anyway, so that's a mixture of Brain-in-a-vat, Ickean swifteanism, a pathetic denial of your previous antecedents to appear more rational, and some self-esteem movement garbage?
>
> Yeah, you're a liberal whigpot wreck.
Can someone do spark notes?
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,234
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
You need sparknotes for David Icke? Fucking c'mon. His shitpost-novels can be skim-read within a sitting.
You need sparknotes for David Icke? Fucking c'mon. His shitpost-novels can be skim-read within a sitting.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,238
@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
I've never read him, didn't realize you meant him. I'll review some of his works
I've never read him, didn't realize you meant him. I'll review some of his works
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 48 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,239
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
Really, don't. I think even for someone like you it'd be an act of pure debasement. I only read them out of curiosity, but the guy's a fucking hack, and a plagiarist to boot.
Really, don't. I think even for someone like you it'd be an act of pure debasement. I only read them out of curiosity, but the guy's a fucking hack, and a plagiarist to boot.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,241
@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
What are his thoughts?
I may live knowing that humans could become godlike on earth, but I also live knowing that no one group of people will believe it strong enough in my life
What are his thoughts?
I may live knowing that humans could become godlike on earth, but I also live knowing that no one group of people will believe it strong enough in my life
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,243
@previous (Hello !KiTtY4Diw.)
If you want a summary of everything he's ever done, he did a 7 hour speech at the Brixton academy in 2010, you should go see that on YouTube, his books are that repeated 52 times over with the slightest of variations that make me wonder if Icke himself has autism.
If you want a summary of everything he's ever done, he did a 7 hour speech at the Brixton academy in 2010, you should go see that on YouTube, his books are that repeated 52 times over with the slightest of variations that make me wonder if Icke himself has autism.
·Hello !KiTtY4Diw. — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,245
·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 12.8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,249
+Anti — 12.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,466
@342,217 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
lol, it's all good fun and just because I like an author and can appreciate his ideas doesn't mean I accept them wholesale, bud.
lol, it's all good fun and just because I like an author and can appreciate his ideas doesn't mean I accept them wholesale, bud.
+Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 12.8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,475
I guess this is the most likely option for me.
> Open transgender (possibly with other mental illnesses) trying to fit in
But I support equality for all genders.
> Open transgender (possibly with other mental illnesses) trying to fit in
But I support equality for all genders.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 40 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,503
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
I can buy that you're sincere enough to take the whole 'feminist equality' syllogism literally.
I can buy that you're sincere enough to take the whole 'feminist equality' syllogism literally.
·Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 12.8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,511
@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Feminist? No. I've been on too many chans to realize that radfems don't want equality.
Feminist? No. I've been on too many chans to realize that radfems don't want equality.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.