Topic: Transsexuals can be devided roughly into these categories:
+Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.8 years ago #29,376
Autogynephile heterosexual transsexual (read: wannabe dykes), who are typically dumpy autists.
Homosexual transsexual, who are, as the name implies, gay men going far too far in pursuing men; some may have autogynephillic features combined, but the majority don't even care for appearing particularly female beyond a bear minimum passable for some sissification-submission fantasy.
The asexual eunuch pseudo-transsexual, again typically mentally disordered and/or autists, who simply want to punish themselves out of some quasi-feminist piety. They express some mild form of non-parafetishistic autogynephillia. They are so self-loathing that even the establishment refuses to treat them most of the time, resultantly they kill themselves.
Female-to-male transsexuals are not really transsexuals. They're severe autists who struggle with their succubi social role, perhaps because they legitimately do have a neurology more oriented to hypermale endeavours, such that they're comparatively benign in terms of their sexually degenerate proclivities, which only really go as far as sticking their clitoral stub in something.
Why the hypermale autist wishes to castrate and feminize himself can probably be blamed on the prolific spread of deviancy-pride agitprop.
Homosexual transsexual, who are, as the name implies, gay men going far too far in pursuing men; some may have autogynephillic features combined, but the majority don't even care for appearing particularly female beyond a bear minimum passable for some sissification-submission fantasy.
The asexual eunuch pseudo-transsexual, again typically mentally disordered and/or autists, who simply want to punish themselves out of some quasi-feminist piety. They express some mild form of non-parafetishistic autogynephillia. They are so self-loathing that even the establishment refuses to treat them most of the time, resultantly they kill themselves.
Female-to-male transsexuals are not really transsexuals. They're severe autists who struggle with their succubi social role, perhaps because they legitimately do have a neurology more oriented to hypermale endeavours, such that they're comparatively benign in terms of their sexually degenerate proclivities, which only really go as far as sticking their clitoral stub in something.
Why the hypermale autist wishes to castrate and feminize himself can probably be blamed on the prolific spread of deviancy-pride agitprop.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
+Anonymous B — 12.8 years ago, 4 minutes later[T] [B] #342,006
1. Hot transexuals
2. Hideous transexuals
3. Hillarious-looking transexuals
How about this? Three Hs too.
2. Hideous transexuals
3. Hillarious-looking transexuals
How about this? Three Hs too.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,011
Hmm, I'm trying to think what explains bisexual transsexuals. I have a funny feeling bisexuality in transsexuals is usually a strong indicator that they really have no devotion to their alleged identity - even in the sense of autogynephillic self-admiration; bisexual trans look fugly - and simply want the perks of everything.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
+Anonymous C — 12.8 years ago, 41 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,057
So what category do Catherine and Triptych belong to?
+ !NoGoD1GamE — 12.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #342,059
·Anonymous B — 12.8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #342,073
@previous (!NoGoD1GamE)
I've never seen Catherine and Triptych just looks plain. But she's not transexual yet.
I've never seen Catherine and Triptych just looks plain. But she's not transexual yet.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #342,074
@342,057 (C)
Triptych, like all female-to-male transsexuals, is just an autistic hypermale finding her evolutionary way back to the seed of her intellectual fruits. Nothing wrong with that, in my opinion; preferable to the mostly sex-driven machinations of male-to-femalewhores.
Catherine is either of the bisexual autogynephile or homosexual try-hard category.
Triptych, like all female-to-male transsexuals, is just an autistic hypermale finding her evolutionary way back to the seed of her intellectual fruits. Nothing wrong with that, in my opinion; preferable to the mostly sex-driven machinations of male-to-femalewhores.
Catherine is either of the bisexual autogynephile or homosexual try-hard category.
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,110
+Dr. Autphag !wCUWeDmeus — 12.8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,112
+squeegee !!vjxGw8UNy — 12.8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,119
well, you're the tranny expert, OP. you'd know.
+Anonymous H — 12.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,191
One category was intentionakky left out by @OP - the Autphag category. Autphag wouldn't try to camoflage his desire to be a woman behind word salad if his feelings didn't contradict what he wants people to believe so badly.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,195
+Anonymous I — 12.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,326
I've never seen a case of confirmation bias as bad as yours, Autphag. Any piece of information you encounter is immediately filed away as gospel so long as it conforms to your persecutory delusions, while anything less is dismissed as the machinations of the repto-judeofeminist conspiracy.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,344
@previous (I)
And the bastardized version of the scientific method practiced today is not replete with such cherry-picking? You're having a laugh, mate.
And the bastardized version of the scientific method practiced today is not replete with such cherry-picking? You're having a laugh, mate.
·Anonymous H — 12.8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #342,359
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.