Topic: I do not suffer from paranoid delusions
+Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.8 years ago #29,212
Delusions can't be, if they are based on fact. Granted I rely on conjecture to reach my conclusions a good fraction of the time, but only in absence of greater information; if the evidence is deliberately hidden, hypothesis is the best tool we have. The eventual emergence of this proof always universally shows, and by more than coincidence, because it can't be statistically that I'm just inconsequentially right as a happenstance nearly 100% of the time, that there is synchronicity between the nebula of correlating connections and the reality it reveals both in theory and its application factually.
+Anti !M6R0eWkIpk — 12.8 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #339,895
Lolno.
·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs (OP) — 12.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #339,897
@previous (Anti !M6R0eWkIpk)
I do not suffer from paranoid delusions and you can't prove the contrary.
I do not suffer from paranoid delusions and you can't prove the contrary.
·Anti !M6R0eWkIpk — 12.8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #339,899
+Anonymous C — 12.8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #339,902
Using valid reasoning but basing one's argument on false premises is a fallacy, and a symptom of clinical schizophrenia. As a person who is completely bonkers, Autphag thinks his silly delusions are actually true.C̤̲̜i͔͔̹̺̱͕̼a̫o̤̠̖, ̭̱̼̮̯̮T̲h̜̥͕̥̪̪̤e ͍Ḏ̭̺͙͉͕̞o̝͓̳c̻͉̰toṛ.̩̦̞
+Morbid !vbsvhaneDY — 12.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #339,945
Didn't read.+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #340,032
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.