Topic: Why doesn't The Doctor start posting images of Dr. Stanley Biber?

+Anonymous A — 12.9 years ago #27,100

What does Dr. Autphag think about this pioneer in sexual reassignment surgery?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Biber

+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.9 years ago, 25 minutes later[T] [B] #318,140

inb4 mad

+Anonymous C — 12.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,152

@OP
With a name like Biber? Seriously?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,153

@previous (C)
He was featured in the animated Comedy Central program South Park, episode title, "Mr. Garrison's Fancy New Vagina".

+Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,156

Pioneer of surgical technique aside, he would have had nothing were it not for Trotsky and Hirschfield and their work with SEXPOL in promoting Sexual Bolshevism during the 30s, Hirschfield coined the term 'transsexual' in the 1920s; you are trying your best to strawman goy as being the progenators of degeneracy when anybody with a bit of ken in historical review could trace back lines of ideological descension to discern the locum origin.

(Edited 33 seconds later.)

+Anonymous E — 12.9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,160

@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)

73-words word salad.

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,185

@318,156 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)

Word salad.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,377

@318,156 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
According to this website, the concept for transsexuality is dated back to the 1880s.
http://www.cinematter.com/tshistory.html
But how do you know so much about the history of transsexuals?

·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,383

@previous (A)
PFFFT
Try a real encyclopedia:
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Transsexualism

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.9 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,384

@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)

That isn't a real encyclopedia.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,390

@318,383 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
The person who wrote that webpage most likely researched the subject a lot before writing it.
Which is more they can say than Metapedia which appears to be a satire site like Uncyclepedia.

·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,392

@previous (A)
"Everything I disagree with can be trivialized to satire" --- Anonymous A, Jewish community member

Sorry to break it to you, they're 100% serious:
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

You've planned in advance likely that you will retort with a gibe against my ability to discern irony, so allow me to pre-empt you: if there is any irony there, it's either implicit as hell or takes Jewish-tier critical deconstruction to convolute out of thin air, as you'll likely proceed to do.

(Edited 47 seconds later.)

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,396

@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)

Why do you keep posting links to that silly little word salad Wiki site?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,399

@318,392 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Okay, so they just haven't bothered to research subjects many may find taboo?
Do they even know what the word "taboo" means?

·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,410

@previous (A)
They research subjects that the liberals find taboo; racial anthropology, Aryan mythology, etc; not the false taboos that should rightfully remain taboo.

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,439

@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
> racial anthropoloy
Is that even a thing? Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article about it.
It did pull up this however.

·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,441

@previous (A)
> Wikipedia

Good way to ruin your credibility there, chump:
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Examples_of_censorship_and_propaganda_in_Wikipedia

·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.9 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,442

@previous (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
And what exactly makes Metapedia so credibility?

·Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs — 12.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,443

@previous (A)
Because of its vastly superior mission statement which doesn't merely hide behind the accoutrements of 'impartiality' as Wikipedia proclaims but repeatedly breaches, it actually makes an ethos of going beyond conventional liberal-totalitarian knowledge paradigms inquiring into the essence of critical historical and scientific review itself --- metapolitics:
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Metapedia:Mission_statement

·Anonymous C — 12.9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,459

@318,410 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)
Did you really type that with a straight face?

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 12.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #318,505

@318,410 (Dr. Autphag !MLHqI35Srs)

> They research

That's why it isn't a real encyclopedia.

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan