Topic: Psychopathy test: what's your score?
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago #26,584
I scored 18, which places me in the strong psychopathic tendencies bracket, but I disagree because these values could easily be held by a fairly conscientious person of rightist persuasion. It seems to confuse Darwinianism with psychopathy in many instances.
Link:
http://psychcentral.com/cgi-bin/psychopathy-quiz.cgi
Link:
http://psychcentral.com/cgi-bin/psychopathy-quiz.cgi
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18+ -- strong | - | 0% | |
| 13 - 17 -- moderate/mild | - | 0% | |
| <12 -- none | - | 0% |
+Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 13 years ago, 21 minutes later[T] [B] #313,206
The test is rigged.
+Anonymous C — 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #313,208
I scored an 8.
+Anonymous D — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #313,209
@OP
So now you're a Darwinist?
"Why is that the master-race movement always attracts retards and cripples?" - Charles Bukowski, Ham On Rye.
So now you're a Darwinist?
"Why is that the master-race movement always attracts retards and cripples?" - Charles Bukowski, Ham On Rye.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13 years ago, 22 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #313,212
@previous (D)
> Bukowski
There's your answer. He's a contemptuous little beady-eyed long-nosed kyke.
> Bukowski
There's your answer. He's a contemptuous little beady-eyed long-nosed kyke.
+squeegee — 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #313,214
@313,209 (D)
No, he just doesn't understand altruism nor is he aware of the multitude of examples across species that exhibit altruistic behavior to provide an advantage to the group.
See: bonobos, cats, humans and even mice.
Selfishness is not always rewarded by natural selection.
No, he just doesn't understand altruism nor is he aware of the multitude of examples across species that exhibit altruistic behavior to provide an advantage to the group.
See: bonobos, cats, humans and even mice.
Selfishness is not always rewarded by natural selection.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #313,216
@previous (squeegee )
I understand altruism the same way Ayn Rand does. It's a hypocritical and self-serving device of deceptively naked coercion of the participation of benefactors in uselessly providing bounty to beatitudes at cost to their integrity whilst simultaneously sating one's absence of true conscience with a back-patting gesture of vain charitably.
I understand altruism the same way Ayn Rand does. It's a hypocritical and self-serving device of deceptively naked coercion of the participation of benefactors in uselessly providing bounty to beatitudes at cost to their integrity whilst simultaneously sating one's absence of true conscience with a back-patting gesture of vain charitably.
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
·squeegee — 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,218
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Yeah, but monkeys mice and cats engage in altruistc behavior, such as monkeys sacrificing their lives, cats raising strange kittens, and mice sharing food rewards.
Do the jews make that happen to?
Yeah, but monkeys mice and cats engage in altruistc behavior, such as monkeys sacrificing their lives, cats raising strange kittens, and mice sharing food rewards.
Do the jews make that happen to?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,219
@previous (squeegee )
I would wager that all of these examples are aberrational outliers in the greater scheme of Nature's cruelty by necessity, for only the harsh reality of the wilderness can make racecraft of the being's best.
I would wager that all of these examples are aberrational outliers in the greater scheme of Nature's cruelty by necessity, for only the harsh reality of the wilderness can make racecraft of the being's best.
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,222
@313,216 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag understands altruism the same way Ayn Rand does.
·Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,223
@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
Objectivism is greater than or equal to autism.
Objectivism is greater than or equal to autism.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,224
@previous (Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag would end up starving to death in an alleyway somewhere if the world was run according to Objectivist principles.
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,225
3
wow. that's not what I was expecting.
wow. that's not what I was expecting.
·Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #313,226
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #313,227
+Omen !!hnQvReR0M — 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #313,253
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.