Topic: Ask a brit who hasn't payed his TV license anything

+Anonymous A — 13 years ago #26,081

+Syntax — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later[T] [B] #308,622

Uh you need to look more careful at who its addressed2

I can C wot U not want me to C

+Anonymous C — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,624

@previous (Syntax )
Look at the filename. It's clearly a repost.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,625

@previous (C)
@308,622 (Syntax )
Not a repost. For real.

(Edited 14 seconds later.)

·Anonymous C — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,626

@previous (A)
Whatever you say, troll.

·Syntax — 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,628

Well in any case its well known that Brits have vans that drive up n down streets with antennas aimed at houses/flats to pick up EMI that all TV sets put out.

It by the way is possible to get around this but it wood be one hell of a pain in ass to do so.

+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,629

They can't ask anything of a man who doesn't even watch their Judeomasonic propaganda strongarm.

(Edited 8 seconds later.)

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,630

@308,628 (Syntax )
Not really. They can only detect you watching TV if you're watching live TV and BBC i-player doesn't count. I don't watch anything live and they have no right to enter my property.

+Anonymous E — 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,631

@previous (A)
> they have no right to enter my property.
ORLY? If they have a court order and come dragging with a bobby, I'm sure you are obliged to let them in.

+Anonymous F — 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,632

@OP

Do you use Linux or watch anime?

Is your joy in life to play Minecraft?

You are most certainly mentally ill.

·Syntax — 13 years ago, 23 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,633

@308,630 (A)
You wish that were true. Unless you have Military grade computer and display equip that is ultra shielded and has additional filters?

Your display - your computer etc all put out Electromagnetic junk. Even the power lines emit stuff and back when it was discovered that Russkies were looking at power lines of defense operations to gather that junk and decode it. Of course when learned - Well it just put more Engineers in2 the game of re-design.

Circuit boards running at high MhZ put out one hell of a lot of junk that is easy to spot.

But I also have no clue wot the law is regarding non live views - Clearly if its just tyme delayed recorded off live then common sense says They got ya. But if you have TV gear but never take anything off the airwaves?

And as to enter your property - Vans that are on public roads with all that gear ZERO in on property - Your gear is emitting junk which leaks outside your property on2 everyone Else's property.

I bet Brits have laws that cover THEM and not you IF a friend gives you a copy of a Live TV show but again Law is NOT one of my areas of Expertise - I did take 2 years of it as a minor and learned nuff 2 no I no shit about law -

I do no a lot about EMI radiation and how to prevent it and how to EXPLOIT IT

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 20 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #308,639

@previous (Syntax )
> I know better than you despite not living in the UK

Wow, that's some haughtily arrogant posturing right there.

·Syntax — 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,641

@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
RF Engineering has put a lot of cold hard cash in2 my wallet over the years. Yet this English pay to watch off the air TV is something I have never needed to delve in2

I mean yes I am more then aware of the basics and have looked at the gear Brits use in the Vans that SNIFF IT OUT

But not trying to be arrogant on this matter. I have stolen my share of Cable without pay in long past as so many have. So its not like my hands are clean.

+Anonymous G — 13 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,642

This thread is grate but now has the potential to get grater

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,644

@308,641 (Syntax )
> RF Engineering

Did you invent that?

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,645

@308,641 (Syntax )
I was more in question of your knowledge of the legal specifics which you seem to ruminate over with such authority.
But as it stands, the Britfag (Muslamic infilthtraitor) is right. If he's not watching anything on air (live), and if he's not using that equipment to store or disseminate illegal copies of live television, he's within his rights not to pay a license, he's not doing anything persuant to the conditions. Usually their investigations don't materialize in a court-order, so he needn't worry about that either, and you're within your limits to refuse entry into the property of any of their footagents. If I were him though, I wouldn't even bother watching iPlayer, or the rest of it, the BBC producing nothing but quality-devoid doggerel usually with the explicit purpose of carrying out a propagandizing agenda of social engineering.

+Cat !TGirlYJKXM — 13 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,647

What the fuck is a TV license?

+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,648

@OP

Why do you spell "licence" like a fucktard?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,650

@308,647 (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)
The UK has media channel called the BBC it's a bunch of TV and radio channels which is advert free, they also have self created content and in return you're asked to pay a yearly rate called a TV license.

+Anonymous J — 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,653

@308,647 (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)

You have a licence to carry a concealed television in this country.

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,654

@308,647 (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)
State-mandated coerced taxation for forcibly enfoisted propaganda machine people neither take seriously nor watch in great numbers.

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,655

@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)

Word salad.

·Anonymous E — 13 years ago, 1 second later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,656

@308,654 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,657

@previous (E)

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #308,658

@308,655 (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
OK, BBC-peddling foot-troop rappoteur-of-government-shillings.

·Cat !TGirlYJKXM — 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,661

@308,650 (A)
So then it's not really free if you have to pay a subscription fee. Is there such a thing as free TV in the UK?

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,662

@previous (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)
> Still thinks any television is still watching.

Ahahahahahaa. Fucking reptile-shell of a demihuman.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,663

@308,661 (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)
> advert free.
It means there is no commercial break. You don't have to watch or listen to someone selling a brand. You're viewing does not get interrupted by breaks.

Yes there is free TV in the form of other channels which do have adverts. However, if you own a TV that can pick up BBC channels you must still own a TV license by law.

+Anonymous K — 13 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,664

@308,628 (Syntax )
No they're isn't. Take your Alzheimer's meds.

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,665

@308,663 (A)
@previous (K)
Calling samefag due to similar semantic abhorrences in grammar.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,666

@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Calling retard due to being retarded.

+Anonymous L — 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,668

@308,664 (K)

> No they're isn't.
> they're

Too bad there are no meds for retardation. You could use it.

·Anonymous E — 13 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,669

@308,657 (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
> retarded american capitalization of the caption

·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,674

@308,662 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)

As a person suffering from autism, Autphag is a reptile-shell of a demihuman.

@308,663 (A)

You're still spelling it like a fucktard. I don't think you're really British.

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,677

@308,666 (A)
Calling crypto-Jew due to botch-Arabized so-called "Muslim" surname.
Also
> 666

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,678

@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
You really are the most retarded person I've seen on the chans and I've seen some huge retards.

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,681

@previous (A)
What's wrong, too ascerbicly forthright for your evasive little kyke ways?

·Syntax — 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,695

@308,664 (K)
Hey I do not live there. Looking it up and you get a mixed bag of opinions

http://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-22440,00.html

But those with opinions who say you cannot see a tv in operation from the street clearly have no clue cause all it takes is a Yagi and a spectrum analyze to snoop from .1 mile away or more.

·Cat !TGirlYJKXM — 13 years ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,822

@308,663 (A)
Oh, I misread the word advert, still it sounds pretty silly that one needs to have a license just to watch something on television.

+Red Creme !Soda7m0OQk — 13 years ago, 12 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #308,942

@previous (Cat !TGirlYJKXM)
It sounds like it's more or less equivalent to cable TV in the US, except cable is an unserious scam service that charges exorbitant fees and still crams ads down your throat like fat nigger cocks.

·Cat !TGirlYJKXM — 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #309,010

@previous (Red Creme !Soda7m0OQk)
I was actually thinking the same and who really cares about the advertisements?

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan