Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: Feminism is the best thing that ever happened to the top half of men. Ever.
+Anonymous A — 13.1 years ago #25,659
Sex without commitment.
Women paying their own way.
No need for a man to be the sole breadwinner.
Only the geeks and freaks of men have lost under feminism. I fucking want more of it. Stop whining about women being delusional and start manipulating their delusions to your advantage.
Open your damn eyes and adapt.
+Anonymous B — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #304,295
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #304,296

Not really:
- Pseudo-intellectual women who could never compare to men will eventually displace your positions by hegemonic crowding-out of the 'prevailing power structure' under the context of 'diversification', 'dismantling the old boy's club', and 'egalitarianism'; this has already happened in certain male-dominated fields in academia. (The domination was justified because men have the right neurological 'stuff', women only have flair and verbose style, mimicking the male patterns with skim-reading of things they barely understand and rapidly, yet decontextually, spouted buzzwords and key-terms.)
- All men eventually decline under the matriarchy, as abusive child-rearing makes young boys bear the brunt of psychological trauma and damage, a whole generation of otherwise capable men are lost, and fictional diagnoses like 'autism' are created to supplant the responsibility of women to owe up for their ballbusting damage.
- Society degenerates; men lose their ability to reason, even the capable ones opt for a flair of style and substanceless chatter over the real 'stuff' that makes civilization tick, few men today actually understand how to solve problems (granted, this was always the case, but even less exist today), their minds having been whitewashed long ago by feminist pedagogical techniques.
- Women are arrogant, so are more likely to remain in denial of greater systemic problems in any society they dominate for longer, holding it off to be solved further into the distant future and consequently degenerating further than even the most despotic "patriarchies" ever had. They are also the eternal Jew of nature, so what will happen to the superior male contingent? Once they're done with you and their inherent lesbian sex pathology kicks in, you'll be relegated to eternal enslavement at their service. Enjoy your new life of serfdom under their "nobility."
TL;DR --- Robert Lindsay says most succinctly:
> This is what happens when you let women rule. You end up with millions of ballbreaking feminist cunt types, rape hysteria, sexual harassment hysteria, mass calling men creeps (shaming, emasculation and humiliation of men for the crime of being low status), millions of enraged and increasingly dysfunctional Incels, mass movements towards female hypergamy, Alphas cleaning up like crazy.
> It’s all just shit. Women need to be ruled, and they need to be controlled. Men must rule women. When women get power, you get the Hobbesian Hell that I just described. It’s Hell on Earth. There’s a reason why we never let these bitches rule us. They’re too crazy to run society, and any society they run turns to Hell very quickly.(Edited 7 minutes later.)
+Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 48 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #304,297
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
I think you've been reading too much from the Robert Amsterdam propaganda mill.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #304,299
@previous (D)
Never even heard of the guy. I kind of take the approach I always do and read sporadically and disparately to 'reinvent the wheel'; while it's true some of my own talking points may mirror these folk, often times I come across the findings independently.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #304,302
@304,295 (B)
I really do find Kook's gender credentials suspect, no female I've seen has that large of a forehead. Either she's mildly autistic but slipped through the net with typical female mirroring abilities (to some degree these remain intact in autist females, see my article on female pseudo-autistic psychopathy) or she's a Male to Female transsexual, she can make her pick when she defends herself in light of these claims later.
+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #304,321
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Youve said that females cant be autistic
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #304,327
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
The autism manifests so different and is so different in its underlying neurological structure yielding the pseudo-autistic emanation (as remember psychiatric diagnoses aren't objective and based on loose observation) that yes, technically that's true, but then, so is the mass misdiagnosis of "autistic" males.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,356
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
So I'm either a woman or I have autism. Pick one
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,357
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Nice false-dichotomizing. That's not what I said at all. I'm saying 'autism' when diagnosed in females is a placeholder for something else.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,360
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Then you shouldnt use it at all. Lets see your autistic forehead
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,361
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I'm just using psychiatry's nomenclature. You've a real struggle with the concept of ironic license.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 36 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,384
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Liar, you just cant keep your delusions straight, btw, this is the last time that I'll respond to you on this board. I'll miss you
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #304,385
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
> mad
> you admit to my victory by default
My work here is done.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.