Topic: I've been going to the psychiatrist for the past 6 months to pursue an ADHD diagnosis for free meth
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago #25,588
I come back today, with a schizotypy diagnosis that I didn't fucking want (and I don't see how they seem to find that consistent with autism, although they're thinking about revoking that because on better clinical judgement they finally realize they were fucking mistaken), and I'm on a trial of anti-psychotics which I'll never fucking take lol, but they don't reckon it'll help my condition anyway since they know about my meth habit (on urine and blood testing.) They say, if I so desire, they will start me on a trial dosage of synthetic methamphetamine pills at 5 mg to get me off the illegal stuff if the anti-psychotics don't work or make any symptoms worse.
I'm still not taking those things. Jews can fuck themselves if they think I'll ingest their neurodisruptive dopaminergic-retardant poison.
Oh and they want me to take CBT to 'combat my loose associations.' No fucking chance.
I'm still not taking those things. Jews can fuck themselves if they think I'll ingest their neurodisruptive dopaminergic-retardant poison.
Oh and they want me to take CBT to 'combat my loose associations.' No fucking chance.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
+Anonymous B — 13.1 years ago, 12 minutes later[T] [B] #303,367
How will you get your hormone pills?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #303,370
+Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #303,371
schizotypy or tranny. all the same.
+mechano !b.ltBX1QuE — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #303,372
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #303,373
+Red Creme !Soda7m0OQk — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,380
+Anonymous F — 13.1 years ago, 46 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,382
@OP
> CBT
A healthy regimen of cock and ball torture at the hands of a hot trap will do you some good. Maybe instead of meth you should try and get laid. Why don't you put the same efforts into that as you do getting meds?
> CBT
A healthy regimen of cock and ball torture at the hands of a hot trap will do you some good. Maybe instead of meth you should try and get laid. Why don't you put the same efforts into that as you do getting meds?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,388
+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,391
You almost died! Are you crazy?
·Red Creme !Soda7m0OQk — 13.1 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,392
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,393
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,395
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,396
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g) No you dont. Your fucking heart stopped. You need an intervention
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
+Anonymous H — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,398
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,403
@303,396 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
MY HEART IS IMMORTAL, IT SHALL CONTINUE BEATING, ITS BLOOD PERCOLATIVELY FLOWING THROUGH THE MINDS AND HEARTS OF EVERY ASPERGIAN EVEN BEYOND MY FATAL DEMISE.
MY HEART IS IMMORTAL, IT SHALL CONTINUE BEATING, ITS BLOOD PERCOLATIVELY FLOWING THROUGH THE MINDS AND HEARTS OF EVERY ASPERGIAN EVEN BEYOND MY FATAL DEMISE.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,404
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,406
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
A figurative death-wish; one that immortalizes the essence of life's significance.
A figurative death-wish; one that immortalizes the essence of life's significance.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,411
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g) oh dear. How will you make your mark upon the world?
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
·Anonymous F — 13.1 years ago, 39 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,444
@303,388 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
> Negro-kykoidal projection blahblahblah I'm too tired for this shit.
You have ran out of words for your crypto speak. Typical actions of someone who is angry with their gender.
> Negro-kykoidal projection blahblahblah I'm too tired for this shit.
You have ran out of words for your crypto speak. Typical actions of someone who is angry with their gender.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,450
·Anonymous F — 13.1 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,453
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,454
+Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,479
A month of two ago I thought you were entertaining the schizotypy prognosis as a valid part of your advanced hyperman psyche? You said on your blog it was someone on 888chan who suggested that idea a while back, and you were going to follow it up with your shrink. Also, if the diagnosis of autism is completely wrong then how does that fit in to autism being a skewed (jewish) perception of aryan / autitic genetic supermen?
+Fucky — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,482
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 31 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,483
@303,479 (I)
I've reverted back to my original position prior to then, that all of psychiatry is BS anyway and the labels inherently hold no legitimacy unto themselves.
I've reverted back to my original position prior to then, that all of psychiatry is BS anyway and the labels inherently hold no legitimacy unto themselves.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,485
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
What about my second question then? Surely if their original diagnosis of autism is to deligitimise your superior aspergian mindset then why would they revoke that diagnosis?
What about my second question then? Surely if their original diagnosis of autism is to deligitimise your superior aspergian mindset then why would they revoke that diagnosis?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,486
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,487
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
But they always knew that they were wrong according to you, autism as a diagnosis has always been bullshit that they push to treat the genetically superior as mentally subnormal, isn't that what you've been telling us for months? Why would they admit this now?
But they always knew that they were wrong according to you, autism as a diagnosis has always been bullshit that they push to treat the genetically superior as mentally subnormal, isn't that what you've been telling us for months? Why would they admit this now?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,489
@previous (I)
The damage has been done, this concession is not in the least compensatory for the wreckage bestowed unto my life.
The damage has been done, this concession is not in the least compensatory for the wreckage bestowed unto my life.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,494
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
But their overall goals re autism diagnosis isn't about your life specifically, it's about aspergians in general, their oppression is surely an ongoing process that started before your own diagnosis and will last after your own life ends, don't they need to keep up the charade outside of your life? And why revoke a diagnosis of autism anyway when they could just leave it as is? They don't give a shit about it being compensatory for what they've done to your life, so why even bother?
But their overall goals re autism diagnosis isn't about your life specifically, it's about aspergians in general, their oppression is surely an ongoing process that started before your own diagnosis and will last after your own life ends, don't they need to keep up the charade outside of your life? And why revoke a diagnosis of autism anyway when they could just leave it as is? They don't give a shit about it being compensatory for what they've done to your life, so why even bother?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,497
@previous (I)
> oppression
I never once brought up an argument about our oppression, this is Marxist rhetoric you're injecting from recycled template analyses of the social justice movement; there's no such thing as oppression, but there is such thing as stratification and legislative encodification upon which the DSM is the entire basis for the organization of humans into lines of Freudo-Faustian archetypes. It's called active dysgenics.
What are the point of your last two sham-questions? Seems to me that you're trying to paint me as disingenuous, funny as you're the one casting trick-autotautologies out into the ether.
> oppression
I never once brought up an argument about our oppression, this is Marxist rhetoric you're injecting from recycled template analyses of the social justice movement; there's no such thing as oppression, but there is such thing as stratification and legislative encodification upon which the DSM is the entire basis for the organization of humans into lines of Freudo-Faustian archetypes. It's called active dysgenics.
What are the point of your last two sham-questions? Seems to me that you're trying to paint me as disingenuous, funny as you're the one casting trick-autotautologies out into the ether.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,498
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Sorry, oppression was the wrong word to use, you're right about that rhetoric, but you've spoken before about the jewish diagnosis of autism being yet another way that keep things under their control, and also the superiority of aryan (and, by extension, aspergian) people being something they want to hold back as it's a threat to them, yes? Have I gotten something wrong about views in this case that they misuse a bastardised idea of psychology to hold back people who are a threat to their complete control? You say yourself that they made a wreckage of your own life, so I don't know I'm missing there.
My last questions aren't anything more than what I ask, why the jews would do a 180 on their plan to paint your apparent autism as a disability when it doesn't really benefit them to do so. Considering you talk about how they strain to control every almost every aspect of society I don't see why they would get lax on any one single aspect out of nowhere.
Sorry, oppression was the wrong word to use, you're right about that rhetoric, but you've spoken before about the jewish diagnosis of autism being yet another way that keep things under their control, and also the superiority of aryan (and, by extension, aspergian) people being something they want to hold back as it's a threat to them, yes? Have I gotten something wrong about views in this case that they misuse a bastardised idea of psychology to hold back people who are a threat to their complete control? You say yourself that they made a wreckage of your own life, so I don't know I'm missing there.
My last questions aren't anything more than what I ask, why the jews would do a 180 on their plan to paint your apparent autism as a disability when it doesn't really benefit them to do so. Considering you talk about how they strain to control every almost every aspect of society I don't see why they would get lax on any one single aspect out of nowhere.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,499
> since they know about my meth habit (on urine and blood testing.) They say, if I so desire, they will start me on a trial dosage of synthetic methamphetamine pills at 5 mg to get me off the illegal stuff
So your psych knows you are taking meth? You'll never get a prescription from them for the legal versions then, that's a massive red flag for them.
So your psych knows you are taking meth? You'll never get a prescription from them for the legal versions then, that's a massive red flag for them.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Fucky — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,500
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 33 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,501
@303,498 (I)
Your use of the word 'apparent' confuses me, because you either mean to say that my autism is obvious to all or that you acknowledge the illusory nature of the autism diagnosis. Given the general critical tone of your inquiry I'm going to have to assume the former. I would have to disagree, many aspects of my behaviour don't fall in line with autism, and whilst the Jews don't practice it as a science but rather a political tool, which is a point upon which you're absolutely correct in your interpretation of my previous works, plenty of non-Jewish subsidiaries within the system will hold the literal belief of it as a valid scientific paradigm empirically applying it to the best of their ability. This is what we refer to in political theory as "parralel governance," those at the bottom will osmotically absorb the propaganda to the letter and try to function their best with the paradigm they've been imparted, even if it makes them run like headless chickens in continual circles, and it would appear that in actual fact, revisions to diagnoses and rediagnoses of individuals are relatively common to allow some fluidity within the fabric while maintaining the overall line of their overarching agenda. Indeed, concessionary oversight would not affect their overall plans to misextrapolate Asperger's prototypical concepts in such a manner, so as an individual asset I am of minimal import to their plans, they would rather have an unquestioning contingent of puppets who will swallow, upon foisted acceptance of their condition and the "insight" forced upon them to believe the legitimacy of which, the neurodiversity propaganda without question. It is individuals like me who can engage in any depth of critique into this that will ultimately damage their cause.
Your use of the word 'apparent' confuses me, because you either mean to say that my autism is obvious to all or that you acknowledge the illusory nature of the autism diagnosis. Given the general critical tone of your inquiry I'm going to have to assume the former. I would have to disagree, many aspects of my behaviour don't fall in line with autism, and whilst the Jews don't practice it as a science but rather a political tool, which is a point upon which you're absolutely correct in your interpretation of my previous works, plenty of non-Jewish subsidiaries within the system will hold the literal belief of it as a valid scientific paradigm empirically applying it to the best of their ability. This is what we refer to in political theory as "parralel governance," those at the bottom will osmotically absorb the propaganda to the letter and try to function their best with the paradigm they've been imparted, even if it makes them run like headless chickens in continual circles, and it would appear that in actual fact, revisions to diagnoses and rediagnoses of individuals are relatively common to allow some fluidity within the fabric while maintaining the overall line of their overarching agenda. Indeed, concessionary oversight would not affect their overall plans to misextrapolate Asperger's prototypical concepts in such a manner, so as an individual asset I am of minimal import to their plans, they would rather have an unquestioning contingent of puppets who will swallow, upon foisted acceptance of their condition and the "insight" forced upon them to believe the legitimacy of which, the neurodiversity propaganda without question. It is individuals like me who can engage in any depth of critique into this that will ultimately damage their cause.
·Fucky — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,503
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,504
@303,501 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
No, I did mean the latter, I have no clue when it comes to the diagnoses of autism and I wouldn't dream that anything about it is obvious to all, particularly not when it's not even obvious to the people making up the fucking rules for it. So are you saying the occasional leniency in their schemes (in this case, the revocation of a diagnosis) is done to keep within acceptable parameters of keeping up appearances, to not make their attempts at control too obvious? I just want to be sure of your opinion here, I understand that doing this will have no negative effect on their plans, it just seems to me in the way you usually portray them that they won't make any move that isn't directly beneficial to them.
No, I did mean the latter, I have no clue when it comes to the diagnoses of autism and I wouldn't dream that anything about it is obvious to all, particularly not when it's not even obvious to the people making up the fucking rules for it. So are you saying the occasional leniency in their schemes (in this case, the revocation of a diagnosis) is done to keep within acceptable parameters of keeping up appearances, to not make their attempts at control too obvious? I just want to be sure of your opinion here, I understand that doing this will have no negative effect on their plans, it just seems to me in the way you usually portray them that they won't make any move that isn't directly beneficial to them.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 47 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,505
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,506
@303,504 (I)
That's precisely it though, for them to do something that has no negative effect on their plans isn't a move that is of a detriment to them, making it a zero-sum game; they win, no matter the circumstances.
That's precisely it though, for them to do something that has no negative effect on their plans isn't a move that is of a detriment to them, making it a zero-sum game; they win, no matter the circumstances.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,507
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
But if it also has no positive effect then why do it in the first place? Surely they would only make a move if they have something to gain from it. If an action nets no negative or positive gain then they have no motive to do it at all.
But if it also has no positive effect then why do it in the first place? Surely they would only make a move if they have something to gain from it. If an action nets no negative or positive gain then they have no motive to do it at all.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,508
@previous (I)
Referring back to parralel governance theory; the zero-sum game only takes into account the net advantage to both elements of the system, but with respect to the Jews at the top, they just shift the risk-probability curve downwards to their shills at the bottom, who sort the mess, and they're the ones who take the trough of the iceburg in terms of risk.
Referring back to parralel governance theory; the zero-sum game only takes into account the net advantage to both elements of the system, but with respect to the Jews at the top, they just shift the risk-probability curve downwards to their shills at the bottom, who sort the mess, and they're the ones who take the trough of the iceburg in terms of risk.
+Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 13.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,509
> Been at it for 6 months
> Still can't get ADHD meds
> Psych's DX: schizotypal personality disorder
Ziprasidone and diazepam is indicated here. I'm also going to make the suggestion that you discontinue using stimulants.
Nurse, please take him away.
> Still can't get ADHD meds
> Psych's DX: schizotypal personality disorder
Ziprasidone and diazepam is indicated here. I'm also going to make the suggestion that you discontinue using stimulants.
Nurse, please take him away.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,510
@303,508 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
But why even do that, why push risk on people further down their chain of command? What's the purpose of doing that?
But why even do that, why push risk on people further down their chain of command? What's the purpose of doing that?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,511
@previous (I)
Was the iceberg analogy not enough of a clue? You might be familiar with chaos theory. What better way to keep control than to have their operations continue under the seeming guise of an order that has in empirical value absolutely no predictability whatsoever.
Was the iceberg analogy not enough of a clue? You might be familiar with chaos theory. What better way to keep control than to have their operations continue under the seeming guise of an order that has in empirical value absolutely no predictability whatsoever.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 0 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,512
Actually, let me be more specific, why create a risk to push on people further down their chain of command?
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,513
@303,511 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
How is revoking diagnoses keeping up seeming guise of order? Just seems to highlight it's natural unpredictability if they don't keep to their original standpoints.
How is revoking diagnoses keeping up seeming guise of order? Just seems to highlight it's natural unpredictability if they don't keep to their original standpoints.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,514
@previous (I)
They can make their "science" look self-correcting at the most anomalous level so that it remains impervious to criticism.
They can make their "science" look self-correcting at the most anomalous level so that it remains impervious to criticism.
·Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,518
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Ah, to ape the way that real science is actually a process of continuous refinement? Right, we're on the same page now, pretty much what I was saying before about making their attempts at control not seem to obvious by admitting the occasional "mistake".
Ah, to ape the way that real science is actually a process of continuous refinement? Right, we're on the same page now, pretty much what I was saying before about making their attempts at control not seem to obvious by admitting the occasional "mistake".
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
+ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,559
omfg autfag, i fucking love you. you are the strangest middle aged man i will ever know. there is no one like you on this planet. you blow my fucking mind every day. i love you
·Fucky — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,560
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 39 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,578
@303,559 (ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY) You should date him, if you and quack dont work out
·Fucky — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,579
@previous (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Now that would really piss off syntax. He's the premier senior in her life.
Now that would really piss off syntax. He's the premier senior in her life.
·Anonymous H — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,580
@303,578 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
I think that if ducky moved in with Autphag he'd finally start working full time, and would only come home to sleep.
I think that if ducky moved in with Autphag he'd finally start working full time, and would only come home to sleep.
·ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,581
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,582
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.1 years ago, 33 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,583
·ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,585
autphags cool I dont want him to die
·Anonymous F — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,596
·Dr. Autphag !fvna3QzWVM — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #303,602
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.