Topic: Every Kook and TGComix post to date
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago #25,357
Seriously, this is what passes for debate on Scatchan, yet their deluded paddy Icarus upholds that I'm the one issuing the ad hominems. I do, intermittently between relentlessly destroying them with elementary philology, but it seems they're so desperate to grasp straws that they'll ignore the latter.+Anonymous B — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later[T] [B] #300,656
Just stop going to that site. They are just baiting you like we bait Kook
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #300,657
@previous (B)
I enjoy fucking with them. This is what you don't get. It isn't so much frustration as they can't see their unfitness to compete or contend with me, it's hilarious to witness the sheer autismal lack of insight they both exhibit, quite ironically juxtaposed to their shit-tier armchair psychoanalytical skim-analyses asserting my own =- non-existent and largely contrived on their part --- alleged "flaws." And all it takes is to reveal how little they actually understand of the subject matter in question. Like negroids, they think in soundbites, stringed together randomly; it takes a White man to dispel the situation with an infusion of logical synthesis, much like the garnishment of spice to a dry, dull, boring dish, my spice to their intellectually bromidal pablum.
Oh, and in addition, I'm banned anyway for the next 6 hours. I'll continue accumulating these bans as trophies to flagrantly flaunt in front of their faces how dimly I view their pithy moral piety, tendentuity and sententity. The dog killing anecdote really did the trick in revealing their frailty; not even the supposed men there are actually genuine neurological males, they're some butchered and androgynous "new male" ala Soviet polytechnical pedagogy, trained to passively accept being dragged down by the experiential instinct of platitudinous effeminate mediocrity, to think with the proverbial ovary.
I enjoy fucking with them. This is what you don't get. It isn't so much frustration as they can't see their unfitness to compete or contend with me, it's hilarious to witness the sheer autismal lack of insight they both exhibit, quite ironically juxtaposed to their shit-tier armchair psychoanalytical skim-analyses asserting my own =- non-existent and largely contrived on their part --- alleged "flaws." And all it takes is to reveal how little they actually understand of the subject matter in question. Like negroids, they think in soundbites, stringed together randomly; it takes a White man to dispel the situation with an infusion of logical synthesis, much like the garnishment of spice to a dry, dull, boring dish, my spice to their intellectually bromidal pablum.
Oh, and in addition, I'm banned anyway for the next 6 hours. I'll continue accumulating these bans as trophies to flagrantly flaunt in front of their faces how dimly I view their pithy moral piety, tendentuity and sententity. The dog killing anecdote really did the trick in revealing their frailty; not even the supposed men there are actually genuine neurological males, they're some butchered and androgynous "new male" ala Soviet polytechnical pedagogy, trained to passively accept being dragged down by the experiential instinct of platitudinous effeminate mediocrity, to think with the proverbial ovary.
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
·Anonymous B — 13.1 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #300,658
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
They say what ever just to make you reply. They're not even trying like you think they are. They'll just mash their keyboard if that worked in you replying.
They say what ever just to make you reply. They're not even trying like you think they are. They'll just mash their keyboard if that worked in you replying.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #300,659
@previous (B)
Perhaps that might be the case, in which it can be argued that they are masochists who actively enjoy partaking in their self-humiliation, in which case they deserve everything they get, for they have brought it onto themselves, even if in humour or boredom. I want their inability to sate their own amusement to bite them for the benefit of my own vicariously derived sadistic pleasure, which so far it has done, for I see the emerging signs of deep resentment.
Perhaps that might be the case, in which it can be argued that they are masochists who actively enjoy partaking in their self-humiliation, in which case they deserve everything they get, for they have brought it onto themselves, even if in humour or boredom. I want their inability to sate their own amusement to bite them for the benefit of my own vicariously derived sadistic pleasure, which so far it has done, for I see the emerging signs of deep resentment.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
+Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 28 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #300,663
bump
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #300,666
@OP
I linked this to Scatchan so they will be ready for your return
I linked this to Scatchan so they will be ready for your return
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #300,669
With your limited understanding of how things work around here you do realize that if they "Nuke" you and every post you ever made will disappear into the ether.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #300,670
@previous (C)
Which works in my favour, because they'll now be absolutely without foundation in their claims levelled against me, being devoid of the evidence to back it. Not that it exists in the first place; as it stands now, it would take them to doctor my posts in order to build the justification legitimating their position. Their repute is cast into question one way or the other, but they perjure themselves in deliberately eradicating the evidence. That's a fucking retarded statement to make. I'll make sure to precipitate the happening of my permanent erasure from the site; you have a limited understanding of strategic tacticry.
Which works in my favour, because they'll now be absolutely without foundation in their claims levelled against me, being devoid of the evidence to back it. Not that it exists in the first place; as it stands now, it would take them to doctor my posts in order to build the justification legitimating their position. Their repute is cast into question one way or the other, but they perjure themselves in deliberately eradicating the evidence. That's a fucking retarded statement to make. I'll make sure to precipitate the happening of my permanent erasure from the site; you have a limited understanding of strategic tacticry.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #300,671
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
And when the same happens here, as it surely will, where will you go next?
And when the same happens here, as it surely will, where will you go next?
+Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,673
@300,670 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
The only way to win the game is to not play, Autphag. TG2Shitcarufus feeds on any attention you give him, preferably the negative type. Why do you think he's been butthurt over the internet for 5+ years?
The only way to win the game is to not play, Autphag. TG2Shitcarufus feeds on any attention you give him, preferably the negative type. Why do you think he's been butthurt over the internet for 5+ years?
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,675
@previous (D)
I don't believe it to be entirely zero-sum; I'm sure if I push the upper limit of my stakes curve high enough, my yield shall be enormous.
I don't believe it to be entirely zero-sum; I'm sure if I push the upper limit of my stakes curve high enough, my yield shall be enormous.
·Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,676
+Anonymous E — 13.1 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,677
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,682
@300,676 (D)
The difference is I'm not trolling, I'm quite genuine about my endeavour here. The whole playing to their lolcow is an imaginary figment of their own deconvalescence.
The difference is I'm not trolling, I'm quite genuine about my endeavour here. The whole playing to their lolcow is an imaginary figment of their own deconvalescence.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
·Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,684
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
It doesn't matter to them what your intentions are. You're giving them any kind of attention and that's the point. For someone who claims to be an autistic superman you are sure are easily manipulated by these folks.
It doesn't matter to them what your intentions are. You're giving them any kind of attention and that's the point. For someone who claims to be an autistic superman you are sure are easily manipulated by these folks.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,685
@previous (D)
This is the misunderstanding you make, that I didn't take on my own volition their ploy as an invitation to exploit it for my own amusement. I took it not because I literally saw TGComix's opening gambit as a 'concerned citizen' sincerely informing me of events at his site; the set-up was obvious even to me, I never suspend from thinking in conspiratorial terms and it should be obvious that this was my understanding throughout. Initially acting a bit beneath my potential station has lured him into repetitive meme-spouting, which opened the path for a counter-retaliative flank of erudition. One which shall be continued when I am unbanned. Then they will have no choice but to conceal their humiliation, burying it under a permanuke.
I think you're trying to cast aspersions of naivety onto me so as to enhance the bias of TGComix's convoluted narrative, possibly working with her to reinforce this image; therefore you can't dispense trustworthy advice, I'd be wise to ignore you. Several users on the board understand who is actually winning here. It's not TGComix with his over-inflated self-assessments of intellect in proportion to his ego maniacism, nor is it kook with her childish negritude replete with sass.
This is the misunderstanding you make, that I didn't take on my own volition their ploy as an invitation to exploit it for my own amusement. I took it not because I literally saw TGComix's opening gambit as a 'concerned citizen' sincerely informing me of events at his site; the set-up was obvious even to me, I never suspend from thinking in conspiratorial terms and it should be obvious that this was my understanding throughout. Initially acting a bit beneath my potential station has lured him into repetitive meme-spouting, which opened the path for a counter-retaliative flank of erudition. One which shall be continued when I am unbanned. Then they will have no choice but to conceal their humiliation, burying it under a permanuke.
I think you're trying to cast aspersions of naivety onto me so as to enhance the bias of TGComix's convoluted narrative, possibly working with her to reinforce this image; therefore you can't dispense trustworthy advice, I'd be wise to ignore you. Several users on the board understand who is actually winning here. It's not TGComix with his over-inflated self-assessments of intellect in proportion to his ego maniacism, nor is it kook with her childish negritude replete with sass.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
·Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,686
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Except I've never said anything pro his narrative. I don't talk shit about you or call you a dog killer or a tranny fucker or whatever. You are naive, insofar that you miss the point that giving shitchan any kind of traffic is to validate its existence. If you just want to have an internet argument and that's the only place you can find one, just say so. Don't pretend you don't care then write massive rambling posts saying you don't when your actions obviously defy your words.
Except I've never said anything pro his narrative. I don't talk shit about you or call you a dog killer or a tranny fucker or whatever. You are naive, insofar that you miss the point that giving shitchan any kind of traffic is to validate its existence. If you just want to have an internet argument and that's the only place you can find one, just say so. Don't pretend you don't care then write massive rambling posts saying you don't when your actions obviously defy your words.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 56 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,687
@previous (D)
I'm not even feigning indifference at this point. I care, but it's not a feeling of irritation. It's a feeling of elation. Make the distinction. I get fully well that I am validating its existence by acknowledging it, but only insofar as my personal shitting ground and sandbox of wreckless pathologization. They are literally on the couch as a canvas to my portentions. Yet, you still don't get the underlying basis of the strategem, or the metatactical implications involved here. You are not thinking in the wide and specific, but in the narrow and general.
I'm not even feigning indifference at this point. I care, but it's not a feeling of irritation. It's a feeling of elation. Make the distinction. I get fully well that I am validating its existence by acknowledging it, but only insofar as my personal shitting ground and sandbox of wreckless pathologization. They are literally on the couch as a canvas to my portentions. Yet, you still don't get the underlying basis of the strategem, or the metatactical implications involved here. You are not thinking in the wide and specific, but in the narrow and general.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Anonymous E — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,688
@300,677 (E)
> my yield shall be enormous.
> Oooops, that is a giveaway.
I know who you are. For the time being it will be my secret but ...
> my yield shall be enormous.
> Oooops, that is a giveaway.
I know who you are. For the time being it will be my secret but ...
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,689
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13.1 years ago, 31 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,696
@OPAs a person suffering from autism, Autphag likes to whine about events on other forums as part of his silly little stimming routine.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 29 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,697
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,701
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag doesn't understand that his silly little internet tiffs are worthy of neither documentation nor analysis.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,702
@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
That's a double negative. You're then saying that I understand my "internet tiffs" are in fact worthy of documentation and analysis.
That's a double negative. You're then saying that I understand my "internet tiffs" are in fact worthy of documentation and analysis.
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,706
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag is cognitively impaired and doesn't know what a double negative is.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,709
@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
As a person suffering from schizophrenia, The Doctor frequently displaces his own cognitive deficits onto others by impresting synthesized homunculi in a disassociative misidentification between subject and object.
As a person suffering from schizophrenia, The Doctor frequently displaces his own cognitive deficits onto others by impresting synthesized homunculi in a disassociative misidentification between subject and object.
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,712
+Anonymous G — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,719
@300,702 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
> his silly little internet tiffs are worthy of neither documentation nor analysis.
equals
> his silly little internet tiffs are not worthy of either documentation or analysis.
and then
> Autphag doesn't understand that...
Which does not negate the dependent clause, but only states that you do not realize that it's true. Verbal IQ of 136, my ass.
> his silly little internet tiffs are worthy of neither documentation nor analysis.
equals
> his silly little internet tiffs are not worthy of either documentation or analysis.
and then
> Autphag doesn't understand that...
Which does not negate the dependent clause, but only states that you do not realize that it's true. Verbal IQ of 136, my ass.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 42 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,722
@previous (G)
I said visual, not verbal. Nice strawmanning. Also you selected the only part of the clause that makes sense. Look at all of it. The statement that I'm incapable of understanding what is neither worthy of documentation nor analysis is completely incongruent; the first fragment negates the second.
I said visual, not verbal. Nice strawmanning. Also you selected the only part of the clause that makes sense. Look at all of it. The statement that I'm incapable of understanding what is neither worthy of documentation nor analysis is completely incongruent; the first fragment negates the second.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,723
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag lacks the necessary cognitive faculties to construct a coherent argument.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #300,726
@previous (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
> required an Asiatic Jew only marginally more intelligent than yourself to assist in your battles.
I have a great rebuttal for his claims to his sister being a genius prepared. His short attention span doesn't like long prepared remarks based on research.
> required an Asiatic Jew only marginally more intelligent than yourself to assist in your battles.
I have a great rebuttal for his claims to his sister being a genius prepared. His short attention span doesn't like long prepared remarks based on research.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.