Topic: God Fuck the Queen
+Morbid !Xnp/V/hD1o — 13.1 years ago #24,812
why the hell should Americans care about a stupid "royal" reptilian baby. is this what it's like when our American "news" is plastered over theirs?goddamn these people wear the dumbest fucking shit. these monarch fags are all in tights with jester hats and shit. da fuck
+Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later[T] [B] #295,994
EXACTLYNow that said at least the CRACK opened up to produce one more useless reptile.
+Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #296,049
@OPShe has more social and political skills, not to mention culture and quality, than any American President yet, particularly that Obuma person.
+Anonymous D — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #296,050
+Anonymous E — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #296,051
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,052
@296,049 (C)
She's the largest welfare leach in the country. She's basically an autistic machine-brain savant with reptillian consciousness powers allowing her to feign charm. She's the worst of the Chandlerite under-race.
She's the largest welfare leach in the country. She's basically an autistic machine-brain savant with reptillian consciousness powers allowing her to feign charm. She's the worst of the Chandlerite under-race.
+Anonymous G — 13.1 years ago, 40 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,053
crowns are too mainstream of those hipster royals
+Anonymous H — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,054
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,055
@296,051 (E)
That is Kate, a commoner not the Queen, you retard
@296,050 (D)
And The President and his aides all do it for nothing, right. I'll bet the running of the White house costs a darn sight more than Buck House.
That is Kate, a commoner not the Queen, you retard
@296,050 (D)
And The President and his aides all do it for nothing, right. I'll bet the running of the White house costs a darn sight more than Buck House.
·Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,057
·Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,058
@296,055 (C)
> And The President and his aides all do it for nothing, right. I'll bet the running of the White house costs a darn sight more than Buck House.
No question about THAT!
But face facts...The Queen and all her court are figure heads with no power other then to hold on2 wot should be public property and suck cash from the masses.
> And The President and his aides all do it for nothing, right. I'll bet the running of the White house costs a darn sight more than Buck House.
No question about THAT!
But face facts...The Queen and all her court are figure heads with no power other then to hold on2 wot should be public property and suck cash from the masses.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.1 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,059
@296,054 (H)
Syntax, don't anonfag when responding to me, your atrocious grammar is a dead giveaway.
Syntax, don't anonfag when responding to me, your atrocious grammar is a dead giveaway.
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,060
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,062
@296,058 (Syntax )
Wrong, the queen is all powerful - she has the power to dissolve her Government and indeed does so before she appoints a new Government following a General election. If she doesn't like the new Government she could refuse to appoint them and rule directly.
Wrong, the queen is all powerful - she has the power to dissolve her Government and indeed does so before she appoints a new Government following a General election. If she doesn't like the new Government she could refuse to appoint them and rule directly.
·Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 0 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,063
@296,059 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Wot? Wot? Wot?
Where did I do wot?
Shakespeare invented 1400 brand new words and fucked with English. I fuck with English and Mark Twain said:
The Rules of Grammar
"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules-knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings-and I still know one of them: the one which says---but never mind, it will come back to me presently."
And
"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."
And
"...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime."
Wot? Wot? Wot?
Where did I do wot?
Shakespeare invented 1400 brand new words and fucked with English. I fuck with English and Mark Twain said:
The Rules of Grammar
"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules
And
"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."
And
"...ours is a mongrel language which started with a child's vocabulary of three hundred words, and now consists of two hundred and twenty-five thousand; the whole lot, with the exception of the original and legitimate three hundred, borrowed, stolen, smouched from every unwatched language under the sun, the spelling of each individual word of the lot locating the source of the theft and preserving the memory of the revered crime."
·Anonymous C — 13.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,065
·Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,066
+Anonymous I — 13.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,097
What if America adopted the British monarchy again?
·Syntax — 13.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,101
@previous (I)
Running short on tyme for this evening but but but
More better question wood be wot if Britain returned to a real Monarchy. They are paying for it but NOT Using it.
Running short on tyme for this evening but but but
More better question wood be wot if Britain returned to a real Monarchy. They are paying for it but NOT Using it.
+Anonymous J — 13.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #296,102
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.