
QUICK ARTICLE: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF AUTISTIC FEMALES
And people wonder why I’m a misogynist when feminists purposely encourage psychopathic traits within their own specie, with no exception made for Aspeger feminists. But this may not be a sociological emanation: it is hardwired biologically, in spite of the proclamations of feminist academic infiltrators who have tried to shift the blame on males for these pathological traits, and I’ll discuss in one second why this is stupid.
One thing has to be understood about females which in my experience has applied irrespective of neurotype. Sadly females have the upper-hand even against neuronigger* males, nevermind autists in general, in the following areas:
- Cognitive empathy; this is the type of empathy where you ‘think into’ without ‘feeling into’, and is a trait women share with psychopaths generally.
- Ability to suspend and disassociate from affective empathy, the empathy where you ‘feel into’, another trait women share with psychopaths.
- Ability to use tactical strategy based on a cognitively empathic ruleset to manipulate other’s affectual instincts. This is again psychopathic tacticry.
It’s funny how the Jews claim that men are the gender with higher psychopathic factor; when considering the heightened rates of autism, it simply doesn’t hold.
Moreover, it was shown in research conducted by Cohen during his work on the EMB hypothesis that female autists neither have a particularly autistic neurostructure nor have the hormonal support for said neurostructure: no additional testosterone was found, but simply heightened levels of a minero-corticoid precursor named aldosterone. This is the same aldosterone responsible for the retention of water in organic structures creating a state of hydrolysis.
Are autistic females really just suffering from a hydroencephaly lowering their general intelligence? Do autistic females simply exist as an arbritary psychiatric classification to prove the notion that autism is equivocable with retardation? Like Grandin, who with this argument can be considered to be a negroiditic retard with strange spiritual gifts in feigning intellect, they seem only to be utilized as useful idiots for every Jewish cause under the sun: I’ve seen at most one potential female who has ever entertained a non-neurodiversity position, the rest are hopelessly brainwashed by the politically hexorthodoxical hypocrisy of simultaneous individuality-equality which is completely in-congruent.
This is an interesting thought too, considering despite this decreased general intelligence they retain the psychopathic factors above (Donna Williams, Frankfurtschuleist, Trotskyist, and Judeo-deconstructivist who went on to charge the helm of Neurodiversity, was known for invoking fights through general shit-flinging within the confines of her own community; Amanda Baggs, who proclaims to be a low-functioning autistic with strange lexicographical powers, likewise engages in the same social chess) and are quite conceited, bitchy and vindictive to boot. Truly, no woman can be a hypermale, that much is clear.
*Term for non-autistic, not just an expletive epiphet designed to demean, but also to confer their status as racially inferior, assuming “autism" is merely just the Jewish-wide psychiatric pathologization and encodification into medical mythlore of the White race.
Wait did you actually notify us that no woman can be a hypermale?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
@294,560 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Just reminding people that biology doesn't change even if they can imagine insane social constructs to legitimate their disturbed souls.
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
You were reminding yourself, which is odd. Though, I like it