Topic: I seem to have defeated Kook
+Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g — 13.2 years ago #24,582
Seig Heil.
+Rapeculture — 13.2 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #293,741
I defeated her ages ago. The only thing you had to overcome was the remains of her spirit.
+Anonymous C — 13.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,742
Congratulations, now how are you going to defeat the jews?
+ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,743
+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,745
You sure did buddy
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,746
@293,741 (Rapeculture )
By telling me that you wanted to cuddle and have candle light dinners, and then begging me to unblock you?
By telling me that you wanted to cuddle and have candle light dinners, and then begging me to unblock you?
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
·ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,747
+Anonymous F — 13.2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,748
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 47 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,749
@293,745 (kook !!u4KQvs2JM)
Nice thinly veiled sarcasm.
@293,743 (ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY)
@293,742 (C)
One kook at a time.
Nice thinly veiled sarcasm.
@293,743 (ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY)
@293,742 (C)
One kook at a time.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,750
·Anonymous C — 13.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,751
@293,749 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
I don't think most of the jews in power bother with petty arguments on shitty chans, they're too busy controlling the world, how can you ensure your tasty word salads will reach them?
I don't think most of the jews in power bother with petty arguments on shitty chans, they're too busy controlling the world, how can you ensure your tasty word salads will reach them?
·ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.2 years ago, 59 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,752
@293,749 (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
but, we need your help with the jews more
jews first then lesbos
:)
but, we need your help with the jews more
jews first then lesbos
:)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 3 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,753
@293,751 (C)
Exactly what a Jew would say to lousily attempt at concealing their parasitic, leacherous lifestyle allowing them the leisure time to indulge in such imageboard pursuits.
Exactly what a Jew would say to lousily attempt at concealing their parasitic, leacherous lifestyle allowing them the leisure time to indulge in such imageboard pursuits.
·Anonymous C — 13.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,758
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
Yes that's right, jews don't have all their spare time taken up by part time jobs at Kwik-Fit like the aspergian supermen do, it's like you're hardly ever here at all.
Yes that's right, jews don't have all their spare time taken up by part time jobs at Kwik-Fit like the aspergian supermen do, it's like you're hardly ever here at all.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #293,761
+Anonymous G — 13.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #293,770
Beware the nigger menace.
+Anonymous H — 13.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,786
@OP
No, I read every bit of the discussion and she came out on top. You tend to be an emotional mess while she kept her composure and won the debate.
Sorry.
No, I read every bit of the discussion and she came out on top. You tend to be an emotional mess while she kept her composure and won the debate.
Sorry.
·Anonymous H — 13.2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,794
@OP
I also find your need to post your supposed "win" over kook very revealing. Reading your title I could almost imagine you beating your chest in superiority.
It really smacks of inferiority and your need for acceptance and approval.
I am disappoint.
I also find your need to post your supposed "win" over kook very revealing. Reading your title I could almost imagine you beating your chest in superiority.
It really smacks of inferiority and your need for acceptance and approval.
I am disappoint.
+Spiderman !iw3mKMSQO. — 13.2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,795
+Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk — 13.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,807
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,813
@293,794 (H)
I like how you feel the need to project Kook's inferiority complex on her behalf by claiming that she is the impartial party when it was obvious that she only really had one highly emotional gambit, about claiming the other party was the one being emotional and irrational.
Without even axiomatic proof that her claim was logically correct, it can be relegated to a classification of argument on tier with a cheap suggestive trick, no better than most Jew-produced advertising or marketing; it was literally an assertion, badly rephrased a multiple amount of times.
Seeing as you're probably not White though, your Jewish, Khazzarid, Turko-Mongoloid-Amerind mind can't comprehend a purer basis to logic than Kook's feelings of feminist supremacy.
In fact, one would be tempted to say you're striving for her approval, and thus the approval of a member of the inherently inferior female gender, which makes you beyond pathetic.
I like how you feel the need to project Kook's inferiority complex on her behalf by claiming that she is the impartial party when it was obvious that she only really had one highly emotional gambit, about claiming the other party was the one being emotional and irrational.
Without even axiomatic proof that her claim was logically correct, it can be relegated to a classification of argument on tier with a cheap suggestive trick, no better than most Jew-produced advertising or marketing; it was literally an assertion, badly rephrased a multiple amount of times.
Seeing as you're probably not White though, your Jewish, Khazzarid, Turko-Mongoloid-Amerind mind can't comprehend a purer basis to logic than Kook's feelings of feminist supremacy.
In fact, one would be tempted to say you're striving for her approval, and thus the approval of a member of the inherently inferior female gender, which makes you beyond pathetic.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
·Anonymous H — 13.2 years ago, 6 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,892
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)
I like how you take criticism toward you and turn it around toward someone else. So defensive.
Adding, of course, that's you've failed to prove anything since day one.
I like how you take criticism toward you and turn it around toward someone else. So defensive.
Adding, of course, that's you've failed to prove anything since day one.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,893
@previous (H)
I think a frontal lobotomy is in order to control your passive-aggressive psychosis. You've taken an impartial observation of Kook's underhanded tricks and tried to direct it towards me and repersonalize it. I don't think I've seen a neuronigger to date who doesn't make refuge of this unimaginative tactic.
That any of you have failed to disprove anything to date merely places my position at parity.
I think a frontal lobotomy is in order to control your passive-aggressive psychosis. You've taken an impartial observation of Kook's underhanded tricks and tried to direct it towards me and repersonalize it. I don't think I've seen a neuronigger to date who doesn't make refuge of this unimaginative tactic.
That any of you have failed to disprove anything to date merely places my position at parity.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
·Anonymous F — 13.2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,895
@previous (Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g)As a person suffering from autism, Autphag is perpetually huffy.
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,896
@previous (F)
Hardly. I was actually rather amused by his thinly-cloaked aggressive outburst under the guise of scrutiny.
Hardly. I was actually rather amused by his thinly-cloaked aggressive outburst under the guise of scrutiny.
·Anonymous F — 13.2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,904
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,905
·Anonymous F — 13.2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,906
·Anonymous H — 13.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #293,958
·Dr. Autphag !FaiGWhdD4g (OP) — 13.2 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #294,014
@previous (H)
Neither does that make sense in context, but you'll find a way to justify shoehorning it, if your autism in the rest of this thread is indicative.
Neither does that make sense in context, but you'll find a way to justify shoehorning it, if your autism in the rest of this thread is indicative.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.