Topic: Should women submit to background checks when they are wanting an abortion?
+Anonymous A — 13.4 years ago #21,873
Does that really sound all that unreasonable?
+Anonymous B — 13.4 years ago, 4 minutes later[T] [B] #263,261
@OP> Does that really sound all that unreasonable?
Yes.
Ci̳̩̹͚̤a̝̪̳͕͇o̠͔̲̱̟̭̞,̝͎̫̠ͅͅ ͕T͓̼̱̘͈̙ͅh̗̩e͇ ̮Do̯̯͍͔͙̬cto͖̙̩̬̯r̦.̜̥
·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.4 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #263,262
@previous (B)
I know The Doctor wants his broken children from bad homes because they are much more easy to manipulate than those that come from parents that aren't unstable and will actually look after them.
I know The Doctor wants his broken children from bad homes because they are much more easy to manipulate than those that come from parents that aren't unstable and will actually look after them.
·Anonymous B — 13.4 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #263,263
@previous (A)If I wanted more unwanted children born that I could rape I would have answered "no, background checks are reasonable", right?
Ci̹͕̠̖͓ao̺̻̮̥̗̩̞,̰̞͓ ͇̩Ṯ̩͙̗̯͈h̳e̬̹̤ D͈̙o͕̳̝̲̘c͈t̖͍̳o͔̞͙̯̼͍r͓͍̘̠̟͎.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.4 years ago, 12 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #263,264
@previous (B)
> using double negatives
Hi, Doc. Still searching for those child sex stories at this hour I see.
> using double negatives
Hi, Doc. Still searching for those child sex stories at this hour I see.
·Anonymous B — 13.4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #263,266
@previous (A)Illegible gibberish.
Ci͇̯a̘͙̯͕͈̙o͎̖,̙ ͕̭̪T̜̙̠h͙̜̣̺e̹̣̳̝̝̠̝ ̹̣̲̦D͍̥̩o̞̲̱͎̞c̗̹t̩̮̮̗o̖̩̗r.̥͉̫͓̠̜
+ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.4 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #263,286
why
+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.4 years ago, 15 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,648
As long as everyone has to do so for any type of medical procedure.
+Anonymous E — 13.4 years ago, 34 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,664
+Triptych — 13.4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,665
Hmm. What would that achieve?
·ducky !LZ0E5ojVGY — 13.4 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,666
+Anonymous G — 13.4 years ago, 28 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,686
let me say this....abortion is SICK and SAD..
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.4 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,778
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.4 years ago, 19 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,780
+Bastard !jbxEWahT8k — 13.4 years ago, 8 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,795
> 2013> arguing abortion
·Anonymous B — 13.4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,796
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 13.4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #263,797
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.