Topic: Wikipedia takes blowjobs very seriously.

+Anonymous A — 13.5 years ago #19,337

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oral_sex/Archive_2

lol

+Anonymous B — 13.5 years ago, 11 minutes later[T] [B] #237,096

One of the funniest things to do is to read the talk pages on wikipedia. So many obsessive losers ranting about the most inane shit.

+Syntax — 13.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #237,098

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_sex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunnilingus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellatio

SO a quick skim of your link....appears much was removed.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.5 years ago, 11 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #237,099

@237,096 (B)
well what's really amusing to me is that there is a SECOND archive page regarded to this shit, nevermind the fact that the bottom of the actual article includes a video of fruit bats involved in fellatio.

wikipedia users confirmed for zoophiles.

·Syntax — 13.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #237,101

@previous (A)
I got diverted by this and I was looking for the fruit bats to see if they also did 69 with fruit flys'

Gay oral sex drawing

Seriously what is the point of showing a male sucking a penis, a woman sucking a penis is a blowjob too. and everyone loves to watch a woman sucking a penis while the opposite is not true.

First, from reading the above Talk section, the reason that it shows a man giving oral sex to a man (and a woman giving oral sex to a woman, something you didn't mention) is because they're the most illustrative pictures of oral sex that anybody's come up with. Second, I didn't even notice the gender of the participants until I came onto the Talk page and found people asking the same thing you did, so I'm guessing that either I'm unobservant or not a lot of people are bothered by it. Third, claiming that "everyone" loves to watch a woman giving a man a blowjob while the opposite (either a man "sucking a penis," or a man giving a woman oral sex) is wrong and biased. I'd delete this question, partly because it seems like homophobic vandalism and partly because I couldn't come up with a less hostile response, except I hope that this guy will get my point. I'm sorry if I seem angry. Sillstaw 01:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #237,104

@previous (Syntax )
its on the actual article, not the talk page.

·Syntax — 13.5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #237,121

@previous (A)
Well that was interesting and a fast read.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007595

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan