TinyChan

Topic: Does Syntax realize how he has screwed himself?

+Anonymous A13.6 years ago #18,258

The chances are high that at least some of Matt's family will call the police when they receiving threats and harassment via the mail. And Syntax has been bragging all over the chans how he is a direct part of it. Is he stupid? He essentially confessed to a crime online, publicly.

+Anonymous B13.6 years ago, 21 seconds later[T] [B] #223,088

what has he confessed to?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[T] [B] #223,091

@previous (B)
To being a part of, and possessing foreknowledge of (without reporting to police), violations of federal stalking and harassment laws.

·Anonymous B13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,094

@previous (A)
Tell us more of these federal laws.

+Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,096

In Tort Law, intent plays a key role in determining the civil liability of persons who commit harm. Intentional infliction of emotional distress, with specific intent is what he has been admitting to.

Intent is the hardest thing to prove, without written confessions posted on the internet.

+Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,102

They will call both the State Police and the Cyber Police, I'm sure.

+Anonymous E13.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,106

I find it hard to believe anything like that can be prosecuted, even if it involves the mail. There is a lot that can be examined under the microscope of the law, but this does not seem like such a case. It's a guy who doesn't even live in the United States. He lives in a country with few freedoms and a repressive government. His chances of prosecuting are slim.

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,109

@previous (E)
Matt is not the one receiving the harassing mail.

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,111

@previous (C)
I guess Matt's parent's would sue Syntax for sending them explicit photos, but supposedly they will be sent from China with no connection to him. The photos being sent from China would probably make it into a huge international legal clusterfuck. Honestly, are the police in Lafayette, Lousiana going to care? They have real crime to deal with.

(Edited 19 seconds later.)


·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,112

@223,109 (C)
So what? His family will call the cops, be sure of it. And Def has admitted to being a part of it. He will get in trouble somehow. It is foolish to send harassing letters in the mail to people you know nothing of. What if some of Matt's family are rich, or well-connected, or lawyers, or even in the police? Shit, I would never take that risk.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,113

@223,111 (D)
It makes is much easier that Syntax has already publicly admitted to it online.

+Anonymous F13.6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,114

Does MAtt seriously still need his parents to fight his battles? lol

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,119

@223,113 (A)
Okay but who is "Syntax"? Supposedly he's Lynne Brian Goldstein of Cardiff by the Sea, California but to prove in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt, the court would have to go through lots of posts here, subpoena IP addresses, subpoena Syntax, do depositions, set up a Federal trial, and its just too much work over a few scat photos.

If Syntax sent them anthrax then yes the feds would go through all this trouble but no one cares about a few bad photos.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,120

@223,114 (F)
Daddy Marsden wasn't very good at fighting his own legal battles so they will be no help.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,128

def2.jpg@223,119 (D)
Criminal or civil, be assured that Lynne Brian Goldstein will be made to pay for his crimes.

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,130

@previous (A)
Arguably, sending pictures of Matt to his relatives would be protected under free speech.

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,131

@223,119 (D)
It really depends on who he's sent them to. I'd hate to think that a child opens one of his letters. That might change things up a gear.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,134

@previous (C)
Ooh, good point! I will personally see to it that a young, innocent child sees them!

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,135

@223,130 (D)
Not free speech...read the US Federal law's definitions of stalking and harassment.

·Anonymous B13.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,140

@previous (A)
No one was stalked, so we can take that out. Tell of what they do to harassers?

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 3 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,141

@223,134 (A)
You really don't know who's opening letters, or who is around at the time. But a pissed off parent would go after him. He's intending to cause harm.

+Anonymous G13.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,146

@223,134 (A)
You want to show pornographic images to a minor?!

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,151

@previous (G)
No, Lynne B. Goldstein does.

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 11 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,152

@223,146 (G)
No, Syntax does.

·Anonymous G13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #223,154

@223,134 (A)

> Ooh, good point! I will personally see to it that a young, innocent child sees them!

You said that, OP. Not Def, but you.

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,169

@223,135 (A)
I didn't say it was necessarily illegal, I said it's not important enough to make a big ass federal case out of.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,174

@previous (D)
Then a big lawsuit.

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,180

@previous (A)
For that, they will have to convince a jury that seeing photoshopped pics of Matt caused them harm. A jury is not going to care about some chan drama. I would be surprised if even .01% of the United States knew of Tinychan/Minichan/tinychan.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 13.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,181

@previous (D)
All they have to do, is convince a jury that Lynne B. Goldstein intended to cause distress, harm, or fear, and he has already admitted that dozens of times all over the internet.

·Anonymous F13.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,182

@previous (A)
Proof?

·Anonymous D13.6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,197

@223,181 (A)
Again, no one outside of .01% of the population knows or cares of Lynne B Goldstein/Sytnax/Def this will never go to court. Honestly, if someone sent your mom photoshopped pics of you, would she go to court?

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,199

@223,180 (D)
that scat chan wordfilter has been in place for how long now?

·Anonymous F13.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #223,203

@previous (C)
Ever since scatman began spamming his boring website here under dozens of proxies.

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #223,221

l.jpg@previous (F)
There's scatlings everywhere nigger

·Anonymous F13.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #223,223

@previous (C)
And it takes one truly autistic faggot to hoard IDs through proxies, fill out captchas and spam their site on a board that doesn't give a fuck.

·Anonymous C13.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #223,227

9680.jpg@previous (F)
It worked on me

·Anonymous G13.6 years ago, 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #223,338

@223,151 (A)
Will you still show porn to minors?

+ !ToastR0A6k13.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #223,433

@previous (G)

That's how he grooms them for rapin'...

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

:

You are required to fill in a captcha for your first 5 posts. Sorry, but this is required to stop people from posting while drunk. Please be responsible and don't drink and post!
If you receive this often, consider not clearing your cookies.



Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.