TinyChan

@OP
> However, she cited various men accused of MeToo transgressions.
>
> I offered that her logic had gaps. If women could spot abusers, there would be no victims.
>
> Second, an ugly middle aged man isn’t necessarily an abuser by appearance alone. That’s prejudgment and stereotyping.
>
> Finally, she cited men who had been cleared. A process that allows an anonymous star chamber and that conveys automatic credibility to accusers, with no repercussions for lying, is fatally flawed.


this is why is to some extent some "incels" have a valid point of contention especially ones that say "not all men" because most of the time what they're trying to say is that yes there are men who committed MeToo Transgressions however there are in also women who abuse the movement and its powers to their advantage because they understand the bureaucracy and the companines along the courts will side with the women regardless of the validity of the claim. Sometimes they'll just take an undisclosed settlement because the very act of getting accused is enough to tarnish a reputatioon anyway even if the evidence points to innocent. making the money is just a bonus.

Not saying im all for women getting beat and have total subjagation over them but sometimes I wonder if this the primary reason we dont have women running our governements or driving cars or even why at one point in time women could not vote.

worse part is that they'll most likely read this veru thread, share the information amongst themselves and form another zeigist of whatever agenda they got cooking. love women and all but their equally if not more cunning and vindictive than men.