Notice: Welcome to TinyChan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can restore your ID. The use of this site requires cookies to be enabled; please cease browsing this site if you don't consent.

TinyChan

New reply in topic: Rule 34

You are not recognized as the original poster of this topic.

:

You are required to fill in a captcha for your first 5 posts. Sorry, but this is required to stop people from posting while drunk. Please be responsible and don't drink and post!
If you receive this often, consider not clearing your cookies.

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.


Replying to vocalon !idBFyTUGQc

at the risk of consecutively posting 3 times because my brain is poisoned by instant messaging apps, i also don't think AI art is that bad. it undeniably usually sucks ass, and aggregate sites like twitter and image boorus really have no tools to manage that kind of spam, but it's the artist that sucks, not the process, in basically every case. again it comes back to people who don't have a full grasp on fundamentals who are easily pleased by performing a kind of abstract "goodness", like dramatic lighting and detailed backgrounds without having the desire or understanding necessary to fix those mistakes, and don't scrutinize the results for more than a couple seconds before firing off the posting machine. and fixing mistakes like that *can* be a pain in the ass with AI, if your inpainting isn't especially strong or your prompting is weak, but at some point, just drawing over the mistakes and hallucinations is easier than making more mistakes and hallucinations.